[Mon Oct 17 16:26:49 2011] Detection parameters:
  Position = (552.7, 761.4) = 9 41 11.24 59 46 16.4
  Extent = 0.6" x 0.5", rotation angle = 63 degrees
  Source counts = 12.6 +/- 3.9
  Background counts = 2.4
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0009

[Mon Oct 17 16:26:49 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 1.62'
[Mon Oct 17 16:27:17 2011] Using EEF radius (= 0.40 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Oct 17 16:27:17 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.40"
[Mon Oct 17 16:27:17 2011] source mask rpix=0.8, npix_max = 6, mask sum = 9, frac = 1.308
[Mon Oct 17 16:27:17 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 3 for pass 0, mean size = 0.40"
[Mon Oct 17 16:27:18 2011] fullrun_ccd7_acisf03035_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src3.ximg exists
[Mon Oct 17 16:27:18 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf03035_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src3.csv
[Mon Oct 17 16:27:18 2011] fullrun_ccd7_acisf03035_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src3_1.ximg exists
[Mon Oct 17 16:27:18 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf03035_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src3.csv
[Mon Oct 17 16:27:18 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd7_acisf03035_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src3_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd7_acisf03035_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src3.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Oct 17 16:27:18 2011] fullrun_ccd7_acisf03035_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3.ximg exists
[Mon Oct 17 16:27:18 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf03035_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3.csv
[Mon Oct 17 16:27:18 2011] fullrun_ccd7_acisf03035_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3_1.ximg exists
[Mon Oct 17 16:27:18 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf03035_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3.csv
[Mon Oct 17 16:27:18 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd7_acisf03035_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd7_acisf03035_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Oct 17 16:27:21 2011] Spatial fit model total counts = 3.788620, observed total counts = 6.000000
[Mon Oct 17 16:27:21 2011] Offset between fit and detection position for source 3 = 0.074065 pixels
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 3 = 0.074065 pixels
  Position = (552.8, 761.4) = 9 41 11.27 59 46 16.2
  Extent = 0.4" x 0.2", rotation angle = 117
  Source counts = 3.1 +/- 1.8
  Background counts = 0.0
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.002
[Mon Oct 17 16:27:21 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Oct 17 16:27:21 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Oct 17 16:27:21 2011] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Oct 17 16:27:21 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Oct 17 16:27:21 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 2.46
[Mon Oct 17 16:27:21 2011] Source is asymmetric
[Mon Oct 17 16:27:34 2011] Using previous fit value to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Oct 17 16:27:34 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.28"
[Mon Oct 17 16:27:34 2011] Spatial fitting skipped for pass 1: source                                 has 3.1 net counts, is at off-axis angle 1.6'
[Mon Oct 17 16:27:37 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Oct 17 16:27:37 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Oct 17 16:27:37 2011] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Oct 17 16:27:37 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Oct 17 16:27:37 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 2.46
[Mon Oct 17 16:27:37 2011] Source is asymmetric
[Mon Oct 17 16:27:37 2011] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9