[Tue Oct  4 21:47:59 2011] Detection parameters:
  Position = (1029.3, 645.7) = 22 29 36.51 61 10 46.3
  Extent = 0.7" x 0.5", rotation angle = 159 degrees
  Source counts = 11.3 +/- 3.6
  Background counts = 1.7
  Rate = 0.0001 +/- 4e-05

[Tue Oct  4 21:48:01 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 4.18'
[Tue Oct  4 21:49:24 2011] Using EEF radius (= 0.89 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Oct  4 21:49:24 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.89"
[Tue Oct  4 21:49:24 2011] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 21, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.179
[Tue Oct  4 21:49:24 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 11 for pass 0, mean size = 0.89"
[Tue Oct  4 21:49:25 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf02787_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src11.ximg exists
[Tue Oct  4 21:49:25 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd0_acisf02787_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src11.csv
[Tue Oct  4 21:49:25 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf02787_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src11_1.ximg exists
[Tue Oct  4 21:49:25 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd0_acisf02787_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src11.csv
[Tue Oct  4 21:49:25 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd0_acisf02787_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src11_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd0_acisf02787_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src11.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Oct  4 21:49:26 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf02787_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src11.ximg exists
[Tue Oct  4 21:49:26 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd0_acisf02787_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src11.csv
[Tue Oct  4 21:49:26 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf02787_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src11_1.ximg exists
[Tue Oct  4 21:49:26 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd0_acisf02787_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src11.csv
[Tue Oct  4 21:49:26 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd0_acisf02787_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src11_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd0_acisf02787_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src11.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Oct  4 21:49:39 2011] Spatial fit model total counts = 15.292800, observed total counts = 17.000000
[Tue Oct  4 21:49:39 2011] Offset between fit and detection position for source 12 = 1.422670 pixels
[Tue Oct  4 21:49:39 2011] 15.912290 total counts/ 6.890960 bgd. counts: snr = 3.436614
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 12 = 1.422670 pixels
  Position = (1030.7, 645.7) = 22 29 36.44 61 10 46.1
  Extent = 0.4 (0.3-0.5)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 9.0 +/- 4.0
  Background counts = 6.9
  Rate = 0.0001 +/- 4e-05
[Tue Oct  4 21:49:39 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Oct  4 21:49:39 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Oct  4 21:49:39 2011] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Tue Oct  4 21:49:39 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Oct  4 21:49:39 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Oct  4 21:49:39 2011] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 1.0