[Thu Sep 29 10:15:00 2011] Detection parameters:
  Position = (705.4, 158.8) = 8 36 9.66 -26 26 30.3
  Extent = 0.5" x 0.5", rotation angle = 171 degrees
  Source counts = 12.3 +/- 3.6
  Background counts = 0.7
  Rate = 0.0006 +/- 0.0002

[Thu Sep 29 10:15:02 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.06'
[Thu Sep 29 10:15:43 2011] Using EEF radius (= 0.44 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Sep 29 10:15:43 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.44"
[Thu Sep 29 10:15:43 2011] source mask rpix=0.9, npix_max = 7, mask sum = 9, frac = 1.170
[Thu Sep 29 10:15:43 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 14 for pass 0, mean size = 0.44"
[Thu Sep 29 10:15:44 2011] fullrun_ccd7_acisf02075_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src14.ximg exists
[Thu Sep 29 10:15:44 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf02075_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src14.csv
[Thu Sep 29 10:15:44 2011] fullrun_ccd7_acisf02075_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src14_1.ximg exists
[Thu Sep 29 10:15:44 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf02075_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src14.csv
[Thu Sep 29 10:15:44 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd7_acisf02075_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src14_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd7_acisf02075_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src14.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Sep 29 10:15:44 2011] fullrun_ccd7_acisf02075_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14.ximg exists
[Thu Sep 29 10:15:44 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf02075_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14.csv
[Thu Sep 29 10:15:44 2011] fullrun_ccd7_acisf02075_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14_1.ximg exists
[Thu Sep 29 10:15:44 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf02075_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14.csv
[Thu Sep 29 10:15:44 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd7_acisf02075_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd7_acisf02075_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Sep 29 10:15:50 2011] Source 9 is offset by 3.969356 and 2.354121 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.443313 x 0.443313, not incorporating fit results
[Thu Sep 29 10:15:50 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu Sep 29 10:15:50 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu Sep 29 10:15:50 2011] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu Sep 29 10:15:50 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu Sep 29 10:15:50 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu Sep 29 10:16:08 2011] Using EEF radius (= 0.44 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Sep 29 10:16:08 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.44"
[Thu Sep 29 10:16:08 2011] source mask rpix=0.9, npix_max = 7, mask sum = 9, frac = 1.170
[Thu Sep 29 10:16:08 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 14 for pass 1, mean size = 0.44"
[Thu Sep 29 10:16:09 2011] fullrun_ccd7_acisf02075_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src14.ximg exists
[Thu Sep 29 10:16:09 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf02075_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src14.csv
[Thu Sep 29 10:16:09 2011] fullrun_ccd7_acisf02075_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src14_1.ximg exists
[Thu Sep 29 10:16:09 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf02075_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src14.csv
[Thu Sep 29 10:16:09 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd7_acisf02075_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src14_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd7_acisf02075_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src14.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Sep 29 10:16:09 2011] fullrun_ccd7_acisf02075_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14.ximg exists
[Thu Sep 29 10:16:09 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf02075_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14.csv
[Thu Sep 29 10:16:09 2011] fullrun_ccd7_acisf02075_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14_1.ximg exists
[Thu Sep 29 10:16:09 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf02075_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14.csv
[Thu Sep 29 10:16:09 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd7_acisf02075_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd7_acisf02075_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Sep 29 10:16:14 2011] Spatial fit model total counts = 14.985900, observed total counts = 18.000000
[Thu Sep 29 10:16:14 2011] Offset between fit and detection position for source 9 = 1.793829 pixels
[Thu Sep 29 10:16:14 2011] 16.075490 total counts/ 10.405000 bgd. counts: snr = 1.757922
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 9 = 1.793829 pixels
  Position = (707.1, 159.4) = 8 36 9.61 -26 26 30.2
  Extent = 0.9" x 0.7", rotation angle = 20
  Source counts = 5.7 +/- 4.0
  Background counts = 10.4
  Rate = 0.0003 +/- 0.0002
[Thu Sep 29 10:16:14 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu Sep 29 10:16:14 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu Sep 29 10:16:14 2011] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu Sep 29 10:16:14 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu Sep 29 10:16:14 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.27
[Thu Sep 29 10:16:14 2011] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9