[Tue Sep 27 05:02:52 2011] Detection parameters:
  Position = (179.7, 25.7) = 9 34 42.69 61 20 36.2
  Extent = 1.2" x 1.0", rotation angle = 162 degrees
  Source counts = 10.1 +/- 3.6
  Background counts = 2.9
  Rate = 0.0002 +/- 7e-05

[Tue Sep 27 05:02:53 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 8.16'
[Tue Sep 27 05:04:10 2011] Using EEF radius (= 2.94 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Sep 27 05:04:10 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 2.94"
[Tue Sep 27 05:04:10 2011] source mask rpix=6.0, npix_max = 167, mask sum = 169, frac = 1.007
[Tue Sep 27 05:04:10 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 0, mean size = 2.94"
[Tue Sep 27 05:04:10 2011] fullrun_ccd3_acisf02033_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src9.ximg exists
[Tue Sep 27 05:04:10 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf02033_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Tue Sep 27 05:04:10 2011] fullrun_ccd3_acisf02033_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg exists
[Tue Sep 27 05:04:10 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf02033_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Tue Sep 27 05:04:10 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd3_acisf02033_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd3_acisf02033_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Sep 27 05:04:11 2011] fullrun_ccd3_acisf02033_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Tue Sep 27 05:04:11 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf02033_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Tue Sep 27 05:04:11 2011] fullrun_ccd3_acisf02033_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Tue Sep 27 05:04:11 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf02033_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Tue Sep 27 05:04:11 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd3_acisf02033_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd3_acisf02033_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Sep 27 05:04:27 2011] Warning: source 9 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 5 at 34.034054 pixels away
[Tue Sep 27 05:04:27 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Sep 27 05:04:27 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Sep 27 05:04:27 2011] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Sep 27 05:04:27 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Sep 27 05:04:27 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.19
[Tue Sep 27 05:04:27 2011] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.8