[Sat Oct  8 00:44:39 2011] Detection parameters:
  Position = (266.5, 956.5) = 15 2 33.01 -41 46 19.3
  Extent = 0.6" x 0.5", rotation angle = 174 degrees
  Source counts = 15.8 +/- 5.0
  Background counts = 9.2
  Rate = 0.0002 +/- 6e-05

[Sat Oct  8 00:44:58 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 1.71'
[Sat Oct  8 00:50:51 2011] Using EEF radius (= 0.41 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Oct  8 00:50:51 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.41"
[Sat Oct  8 00:50:51 2011] source mask rpix=0.8, npix_max = 7, mask sum = 9, frac = 1.285
[Sat Oct  8 00:50:51 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 62 for pass 0, mean size = 0.41"
[Sat Oct  8 00:50:54 2011] fullrun_ccd7_acisf01959_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src62.ximg exists
[Sat Oct  8 00:50:54 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf01959_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src62.csv
[Sat Oct  8 00:50:54 2011] fullrun_ccd7_acisf01959_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src62_1.ximg exists
[Sat Oct  8 00:50:54 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf01959_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src62.csv
[Sat Oct  8 00:50:54 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd7_acisf01959_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src62_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd7_acisf01959_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src62.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Oct  8 00:50:56 2011] fullrun_ccd7_acisf01959_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src62.ximg exists
[Sat Oct  8 00:50:56 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf01959_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src62.csv
[Sat Oct  8 00:50:56 2011] fullrun_ccd7_acisf01959_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src62_1.ximg exists
[Sat Oct  8 00:50:56 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf01959_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src62.csv
[Sat Oct  8 00:50:56 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd7_acisf01959_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src62_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd7_acisf01959_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src62.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Oct  8 00:51:34 2011] Source 19 is offset by -2.833189 and -3.833189 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.411642 x 0.411642, not incorporating fit results
[Sat Oct  8 00:51:34 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Oct  8 00:51:34 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Oct  8 00:51:34 2011] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Oct  8 00:51:34 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Oct  8 00:51:34 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.16
[Sat Oct  8 00:51:34 2011] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.8