[Fri Sep 23 06:43:26 2011] Detection parameters:
  Position = (600.1, 416.4) = 15 54 47.84 -55 8 1.1
  Extent = 1.5" x 0.7", rotation angle = 122 degrees
  Source counts = 14.8 +/- 4.2
  Background counts = 3.2
  Rate = 0.0003 +/- 9e-05

[Fri Sep 23 06:43:29 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 6.77'
[Fri Sep 23 06:44:52 2011] Using EEF radius (= 2.04 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Sep 23 06:44:52 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 2.04"
[Fri Sep 23 06:44:52 2011] source mask rpix=4.2, npix_max = 86, mask sum = 90, frac = 1.040
[Fri Sep 23 06:44:52 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 18 for pass 0, mean size = 2.04"
[Fri Sep 23 06:44:53 2011] fullrun_ccd2_acisf01955_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src18.ximg exists
[Fri Sep 23 06:44:53 2011] fullrun_ccd2_acisf01955_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src18_1.ximg exists
[Fri Sep 23 06:44:53 2011] Fit fullrun_ccd2_acisf01955_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src18 appears to have run properly
[Fri Sep 23 06:44:53 2011] fullrun_ccd2_acisf01955_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18.ximg exists
[Fri Sep 23 06:44:53 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd2_acisf01955_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18.csv
[Fri Sep 23 06:44:53 2011] fullrun_ccd2_acisf01955_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18_1.ximg exists
[Fri Sep 23 06:44:53 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd2_acisf01955_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18.csv
[Fri Sep 23 06:44:53 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd2_acisf01955_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd2_acisf01955_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Sep 23 06:45:07 2011] Spatial fit model total counts = 19.774600, observed total counts = 20.000000
[Fri Sep 23 06:45:07 2011] Offset between fit and detection position for source 29 = 1.067643 pixels
[Fri Sep 23 06:45:07 2011] 20.545600 total counts/ 7.972100 bgd. counts: snr = 4.453176
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 29 = 1.067643 pixels
  Position = (599.7, 417.4) = 15 54 47.89 -55 8 0.9
  Extent = 1.4 (0.9-2.0)", rotation angle = 28 (12-52) degrees
  Source counts = 12.6 +/- 4.5
  Background counts = 8.0
  Rate = 0.0003 +/- 9e-05
[Fri Sep 23 06:45:07 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Sep 23 06:45:07 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Sep 23 06:45:07 2011] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Fri Sep 23 06:45:07 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Sep 23 06:45:07 2011] Computing asymmetry using errors on major and minor axis (from spatial fitting), asym = 1.34
[Fri Sep 23 06:45:36 2011] Using previous fit value to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Sep 23 06:45:36 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.95"
[Fri Sep 23 06:45:36 2011] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 23, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.056
[Fri Sep 23 06:45:36 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 18 for pass 1, mean size = 0.95"
[Fri Sep 23 06:45:37 2011] fullrun_ccd2_acisf01955_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src18.ximg exists
[Fri Sep 23 06:45:37 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd2_acisf01955_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src18.csv
[Fri Sep 23 06:45:37 2011] fullrun_ccd2_acisf01955_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src18_1.ximg exists
[Fri Sep 23 06:45:37 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd2_acisf01955_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src18.csv
[Fri Sep 23 06:45:37 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd2_acisf01955_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src18_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd2_acisf01955_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src18.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Sep 23 06:45:38 2011] fullrun_ccd2_acisf01955_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18.ximg exists
[Fri Sep 23 06:45:38 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd2_acisf01955_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18.csv
[Fri Sep 23 06:45:38 2011] fullrun_ccd2_acisf01955_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18_1.ximg exists
[Fri Sep 23 06:45:38 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd2_acisf01955_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18.csv
[Fri Sep 23 06:45:38 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd2_acisf01955_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd2_acisf01955_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Sep 23 06:45:52 2011] Spatial fit model total counts = 15.968200, observed total counts = 18.000000
[Fri Sep 23 06:45:52 2011] Offset between fit and detection position for source 29 = 1.850080 pixels
[Fri Sep 23 06:45:52 2011] 17.201780 total counts/ 9.392720 bgd. counts: snr = 2.548021
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 29 = 1.850080 pixels
  Position = (598.2, 418.5) = 15 54 47.97 -55 8 0.4
  Extent = 0.4 (0.2-0.7)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 7.8 +/- 4.1
  Background counts = 9.4
  Rate = 0.0002 +/- 8e-05
[Fri Sep 23 06:45:52 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Sep 23 06:45:52 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Sep 23 06:45:52 2011] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Fri Sep 23 06:45:52 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Sep 23 06:45:52 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Sep 23 06:45:52 2011] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9