[Sun Oct 30 06:18:06 2011] Detection parameters:
  Position = (955.7, 1181.7) = 8 22 46.08 -42 46 27.2
  Extent = 0.5" x 0.5", rotation angle = 126 degrees
  Source counts = 114.7 +/- 30.1
  Background counts = 789.3
  Rate = 0.008 +/- 0.002

[Sun Oct 30 06:18:09 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 10.68'
[Sun Oct 30 06:26:21 2011] Using EEF radius (= 5.06 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Oct 30 06:26:21 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 5.06"
[Sun Oct 30 06:26:21 2011] source mask rpix=10.3, npix_max = 465, mask sum = 441, frac = 0.946
[Sun Oct 30 06:26:21 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 0, mean size = 5.06"
[Sun Oct 30 06:26:23 2011] fullrun_ccd5_acisf01949_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src9.ximg exists
[Sun Oct 30 06:26:23 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd5_acisf01949_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Sun Oct 30 06:26:23 2011] fullrun_ccd5_acisf01949_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg exists
[Sun Oct 30 06:26:23 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd5_acisf01949_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Sun Oct 30 06:26:23 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd5_acisf01949_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd5_acisf01949_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Oct 30 06:26:24 2011] fullrun_ccd5_acisf01949_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Sun Oct 30 06:26:24 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd5_acisf01949_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Sun Oct 30 06:26:24 2011] fullrun_ccd5_acisf01949_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Sun Oct 30 06:26:24 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd5_acisf01949_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Sun Oct 30 06:26:24 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd5_acisf01949_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd5_acisf01949_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Oct 30 06:26:45 2011] Warning: source 9 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 30 at 58.493988 pixels away
[Sun Oct 30 06:26:45 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Oct 30 06:26:45 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Oct 30 06:26:45 2011] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Oct 30 06:26:45 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Oct 30 06:26:45 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Oct 30 06:26:45 2011] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.8