[Tue Apr 10 16:15:22 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (1006.4, 356.1) = 13 29 42.55 47 10 42.9
  Extent = 0.5" x 0.5", rotation angle = 24 degrees
  Source counts = 11.7 +/- 3.6
  Background counts = 1.3
  Rate = 0.0004 +/- 0.0001

[Tue Apr 10 16:15:27 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 1.47'
[Tue Apr 10 16:16:27 2012] Using EEF radius (= 0.39 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Apr 10 16:16:27 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.39"
[Tue Apr 10 16:16:27 2012] source mask rpix=0.8, npix_max = 6, mask sum = 6, frac = 0.894
[Tue Apr 10 16:16:27 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 81 for pass 0, mean size = 0.39"
[Tue Apr 10 16:16:30 2012] fullrun_ccd7_acisf01622_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src81.ximg exists
[Tue Apr 10 16:16:30 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf01622_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src81.csv
[Tue Apr 10 16:16:30 2012] fullrun_ccd7_acisf01622_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src81_1.ximg exists
[Tue Apr 10 16:16:30 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf01622_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src81.csv
[Tue Apr 10 16:16:30 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd7_acisf01622_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src81_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd7_acisf01622_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src81.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Apr 10 16:16:33 2012] fullrun_ccd7_acisf01622_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src81.ximg exists
[Tue Apr 10 16:16:33 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf01622_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src81.csv
[Tue Apr 10 16:16:33 2012] fullrun_ccd7_acisf01622_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src81_1.ximg exists
[Tue Apr 10 16:16:33 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf01622_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src81.csv
[Tue Apr 10 16:16:33 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd7_acisf01622_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src81_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd7_acisf01622_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src81.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Apr 10 16:16:53 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 11.336700, observed total counts = 15.000000
[Tue Apr 10 16:16:53 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 30 = 0.617020 pixels
[Tue Apr 10 16:16:53 2012] 12.229306 total counts/ 0.019306 bgd. counts: snr = 87.875390
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 30 = 0.617020 pixels
  Position = (1006.8, 356.6) = 13 29 42.56 47 10 42.9
  Extent = 0.6 (0.4-0.8)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 12.2 +/- 3.5
  Background counts = 0.0
  Rate = 0.0005 +/- 0.0001
[Tue Apr 10 16:16:53 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Apr 10 16:16:53 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Apr 10 16:16:53 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Tue Apr 10 16:16:53 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Apr 10 16:16:53 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Apr 10 16:16:53 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9