[Tue Apr 10 16:15:21 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (697.6, 345.2) = 13 29 57.46 47 10 37.5
  Extent = 0.5" x 0.5", rotation angle = 82 degrees
  Source counts = 15.5 +/- 4.2
  Background counts = 2.5
  Rate = 0.0006 +/- 0.0002

[Tue Apr 10 16:15:27 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 1.51'
[Tue Apr 10 16:16:27 2012] Using EEF radius (= 0.39 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Apr 10 16:16:27 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.39"
[Tue Apr 10 16:16:27 2012] source mask rpix=0.8, npix_max = 6, mask sum = 9, frac = 1.335
[Tue Apr 10 16:16:27 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 69 for pass 0, mean size = 0.39"
[Tue Apr 10 16:16:30 2012] fullrun_ccd7_acisf01622_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src69.ximg exists
[Tue Apr 10 16:16:30 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf01622_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src69.csv
[Tue Apr 10 16:16:30 2012] fullrun_ccd7_acisf01622_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src69_1.ximg exists
[Tue Apr 10 16:16:30 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf01622_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src69.csv
[Tue Apr 10 16:16:30 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd7_acisf01622_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src69_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd7_acisf01622_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src69.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Apr 10 16:16:32 2012] fullrun_ccd7_acisf01622_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src69.ximg exists
[Tue Apr 10 16:16:32 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf01622_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src69.csv
[Tue Apr 10 16:16:32 2012] fullrun_ccd7_acisf01622_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src69_1.ximg exists
[Tue Apr 10 16:16:32 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf01622_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src69.csv
[Tue Apr 10 16:16:32 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd7_acisf01622_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src69_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd7_acisf01622_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src69.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Apr 10 16:16:53 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 26.961000, observed total counts = 22.000000
[Tue Apr 10 16:16:53 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 27
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Tue Apr 10 16:16:53 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Apr 10 16:16:53 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Apr 10 16:16:53 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Apr 10 16:16:53 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Apr 10 16:16:53 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.06
[Tue Apr 10 16:16:53 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9