[Sun Jun 21 12:34:28 2015] Detection parameters:
  Position = (158.9, 711.2) = 15 34 52.31 23 32 48.7
  Extent = 0.6" x 0.5", rotation angle = 99 degrees
  Source counts = 14.2 +/- 4.2
  Background counts = 3.8
  Rate = 8e-05 +/- 3e-05

[Sun Jun 21 12:34:28 2015] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.88'
[Sun Jun 21 12:56:59 2015] Using EEF radius (= 0.56 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Jun 21 12:56:59 2015] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.56"
[Sun Jun 21 12:56:59 2015] source mask rpix=1.1, npix_max = 10, mask sum = 12, frac = 1.126
[Sun Jun 21 12:56:59 2015] Giving source the simple spatial ID 14 for pass 0, mean size = 0.56"
[Sun Jun 21 13:05:32 2015] fullrun_ccd6_acisf16092_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src14.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 21 13:05:32 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd6_acisf16092_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src14.csv
[Sun Jun 21 13:05:32 2015] fullrun_ccd6_acisf16092_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src14_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 21 13:05:32 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd6_acisf16092_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src14.csv
[Sun Jun 21 13:05:32 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd6_acisf16092_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src14_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd6_acisf16092_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src14.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun 21 13:05:32 2015] fullrun_ccd6_acisf16092_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 21 13:05:32 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd6_acisf16092_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14.csv
[Sun Jun 21 13:05:32 2015] fullrun_ccd6_acisf16092_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 21 13:05:32 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd6_acisf16092_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14.csv
[Sun Jun 21 13:05:32 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd6_acisf16092_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd6_acisf16092_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun 21 13:23:07 2015] Spatial fit model total counts = 17.978500, observed total counts = 23.000000
[Sun Jun 21 13:23:07 2015] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 12
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sun Jun 21 13:23:07 2015] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Jun 21 13:23:07 2015] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Jun 21 13:23:07 2015] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Jun 21 13:23:07 2015] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Jun 21 13:23:07 2015] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.12
[Sun Jun 21 13:30:41 2015] Using EEF radius (= 0.56 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Jun 21 13:30:41 2015] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.56"
[Sun Jun 21 13:30:41 2015] source mask rpix=1.1, npix_max = 10, mask sum = 12, frac = 1.126
[Sun Jun 21 13:30:41 2015] Giving source the simple spatial ID 14 for pass 1, mean size = 0.56"
[Sun Jun 21 13:39:44 2015] fullrun_ccd6_acisf16092_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src14.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 21 13:39:44 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd6_acisf16092_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src14.csv
[Sun Jun 21 13:39:44 2015] fullrun_ccd6_acisf16092_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src14_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 21 13:39:44 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd6_acisf16092_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src14.csv
[Sun Jun 21 13:39:44 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd6_acisf16092_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src14_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd6_acisf16092_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src14.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun 21 13:39:44 2015] fullrun_ccd6_acisf16092_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 21 13:39:44 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd6_acisf16092_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14.csv
[Sun Jun 21 13:39:44 2015] fullrun_ccd6_acisf16092_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 21 13:39:44 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd6_acisf16092_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14.csv
[Sun Jun 21 13:39:44 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd6_acisf16092_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd6_acisf16092_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun 21 14:00:16 2015] Spatial fit model total counts = 17.978500, observed total counts = 23.000000
[Sun Jun 21 14:00:16 2015] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 12
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sun Jun 21 14:00:16 2015] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Jun 21 14:00:16 2015] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Jun 21 14:00:16 2015] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Jun 21 14:00:16 2015] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Jun 21 14:00:16 2015] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.12