[Mon May 11 16:31:18 2015] Detection parameters:
  Position = (166.5, 443.5) = 11 28 9.64 58 33 3.8
  Extent = 0.6" x 0.5", rotation angle = 13 degrees
  Source counts = 10.3 +/- 3.3
  Background counts = 0.7
  Rate = 0.0003 +/- 9e-05

[Mon May 11 16:31:18 2015] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.92'
[Mon May 11 16:36:56 2015] Using EEF radius (= 0.56 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon May 11 16:36:56 2015] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.56"
[Mon May 11 16:36:56 2015] source mask rpix=1.1, npix_max = 10, mask sum = 9, frac = 0.829
[Mon May 11 16:36:56 2015] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 0, mean size = 0.56"
[Mon May 11 16:42:59 2015] fullrun_ccd6_acisf15619_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src9.ximg exists
[Mon May 11 16:42:59 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd6_acisf15619_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Mon May 11 16:42:59 2015] fullrun_ccd6_acisf15619_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 11 16:42:59 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd6_acisf15619_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Mon May 11 16:42:59 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd6_acisf15619_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd6_acisf15619_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 11 16:42:59 2015] fullrun_ccd6_acisf15619_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Mon May 11 16:42:59 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd6_acisf15619_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Mon May 11 16:42:59 2015] fullrun_ccd6_acisf15619_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 11 16:42:59 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd6_acisf15619_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Mon May 11 16:42:59 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd6_acisf15619_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd6_acisf15619_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 11 17:08:21 2015] Spatial fit model total counts = 9.703780, observed total counts = 13.000000
[Mon May 11 17:08:21 2015] Offset between fit and detection position for source 8 = 0.610906 pixels
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 8 = 0.610906 pixels
  Position = (166.9, 443.9) = 11 28 9.64 58 33 3.8
  Extent = 0.8 (0.5-1.4)" x 0.6 (0.4-0.9)", rotation angle = 7
  Source counts = 10.6 +/- 3.3
  Background counts = 0.0
  Rate = 0.0003 +/- 8e-05
[Mon May 11 17:08:21 2015] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon May 11 17:08:21 2015] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon May 11 17:08:21 2015] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Mon May 11 17:08:21 2015] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon May 11 17:08:21 2015] Computing asymmetry using errors on major and minor axis (from spatial fitting), asym = 0.56
[Mon May 11 17:11:56 2015] Using previous fit value to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon May 11 17:11:56 2015] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.73"
[Mon May 11 17:11:56 2015] source mask rpix=1.5, npix_max = 15, mask sum = 16, frac = 1.019
[Mon May 11 17:11:56 2015] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 1, mean size = 0.73"
[Mon May 11 17:17:47 2015] fullrun_ccd6_acisf15619_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src9.ximg exists
[Mon May 11 17:17:47 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd6_acisf15619_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src9.csv
[Mon May 11 17:17:47 2015] fullrun_ccd6_acisf15619_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 11 17:17:47 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd6_acisf15619_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src9.csv
[Mon May 11 17:17:47 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd6_acisf15619_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd6_acisf15619_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 11 17:17:47 2015] fullrun_ccd6_acisf15619_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Mon May 11 17:17:47 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd6_acisf15619_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Mon May 11 17:17:47 2015] fullrun_ccd6_acisf15619_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 11 17:17:47 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd6_acisf15619_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Mon May 11 17:17:47 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd6_acisf15619_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd6_acisf15619_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 11 17:30:16 2015] Spatial fit model total counts = 10.831100, observed total counts = 13.000000
[Mon May 11 17:30:16 2015] Offset between fit and detection position for source 8 = 0.115837 pixels
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 8 = 0.115837 pixels
  Position = (167.0, 444.0) = 11 28 9.64 58 33 3.9
  Extent = 0.8 (0.5-1.1)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 11.4 +/- 3.4
  Background counts = 0.0
  Rate = 0.0003 +/- 9e-05
[Mon May 11 17:30:16 2015] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon May 11 17:30:16 2015] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon May 11 17:30:16 2015] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Mon May 11 17:30:16 2015] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon May 11 17:30:16 2015] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00