[Mon May 11 16:31:18 2015] Detection parameters:
  Position = (346.4, 796.6) = 11 27 58.29 58 35 57.3
  Extent = 1.1" x 0.5", rotation angle = 34 degrees
  Source counts = 14.7 +/- 4.0
  Background counts = 1.3
  Rate = 0.0004 +/- 0.0001

[Mon May 11 16:31:18 2015] Off-axis axis estimate = 4.92'
[Mon May 11 16:36:56 2015] Using EEF radius (= 1.15 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon May 11 16:36:56 2015] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 1.15"
[Mon May 11 16:36:56 2015] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 32, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.776
[Mon May 11 16:36:56 2015] Giving source the simple spatial ID 6 for pass 0, mean size = 1.15"
[Mon May 11 16:42:59 2015] fullrun_ccd6_acisf15619_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src6.ximg exists
[Mon May 11 16:42:59 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd6_acisf15619_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src6.csv
[Mon May 11 16:42:59 2015] fullrun_ccd6_acisf15619_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src6_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 11 16:42:59 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd6_acisf15619_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src6.csv
[Mon May 11 16:42:59 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd6_acisf15619_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src6_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd6_acisf15619_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src6.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 11 16:42:59 2015] fullrun_ccd6_acisf15619_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6.ximg exists
[Mon May 11 16:42:59 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd6_acisf15619_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6.csv
[Mon May 11 16:42:59 2015] fullrun_ccd6_acisf15619_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 11 16:42:59 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd6_acisf15619_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6.csv
[Mon May 11 16:42:59 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd6_acisf15619_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd6_acisf15619_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 11 17:08:21 2015] Spatial fit model total counts = 17.055700, observed total counts = 19.000000
[Mon May 11 17:08:21 2015] Offset between fit and detection position for source 11 = 0.579542 pixels
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 11 = 0.579542 pixels
  Position = (345.9, 796.6) = 11 27 58.39 58 35 57.4
  Extent = 2.0 (1.4-2.3)" x 0.8 (0.5-1.0)", rotation angle = 25 (11-38) degrees
  Source counts = 18.4 +/- 4.3
  Background counts = 0.0
  Rate = 0.0005 +/- 0.0001
[Mon May 11 17:08:21 2015] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon May 11 17:08:21 2015] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon May 11 17:08:21 2015] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Mon May 11 17:08:21 2015] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon May 11 17:08:21 2015] Computing asymmetry using errors on major and minor axis (from spatial fitting), asym = 1.30
[Mon May 11 17:11:56 2015] Using previous fit value to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon May 11 17:11:56 2015] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass
[Mon May 11 17:11:56 2015] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 1.35"
[Mon May 11 17:11:56 2015] source mask rpix=2.8, npix_max = 42, mask sum = 42, frac = 0.992
[Mon May 11 17:11:56 2015] Giving source the simple spatial ID 6 for pass 1, mean size = 1.35"
[Mon May 11 17:17:47 2015] fullrun_ccd6_acisf15619_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src6.ximg exists
[Mon May 11 17:17:47 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd6_acisf15619_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src6.csv
[Mon May 11 17:17:47 2015] fullrun_ccd6_acisf15619_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src6_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 11 17:17:47 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd6_acisf15619_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src6.csv
[Mon May 11 17:17:47 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd6_acisf15619_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src6_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd6_acisf15619_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src6.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 11 17:17:47 2015] fullrun_ccd6_acisf15619_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6.ximg exists
[Mon May 11 17:17:47 2015] fullrun_ccd6_acisf15619_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 11 17:17:47 2015] Fit fullrun_ccd6_acisf15619_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6 appears to have run properly
[Mon May 11 17:30:16 2015] Spatial fit model total counts = 16.886900, observed total counts = 20.000000
[Mon May 11 17:30:16 2015] Offset between fit and detection position for source 11 = 0.665765 pixels
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 11 = 0.665765 pixels
  Position = (346.5, 796.9) = 11 27 58.35 58 35 57.5
  Extent = 1.9 (1.3-2.7)" x 0.8 (0.5-1.1)", rotation angle = 30 (14-46) degrees
  Source counts = 17.8 +/- 4.2
  Background counts = 0.0
  Rate = 0.0005 +/- 0.0001
[Mon May 11 17:30:16 2015] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon May 11 17:30:16 2015] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon May 11 17:30:16 2015] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Mon May 11 17:30:16 2015] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon May 11 17:30:16 2015] Computing asymmetry using errors on major and minor axis (from spatial fitting), asym = 1.19