[Fri Aug 14 05:38:22 2015] Detection parameters:
  Position = (621.4, 52.8) = 1 14 5.74 -73 20 7.7
  Extent = 0.5" x 0.5", rotation angle = 39 degrees
  Source counts = 40.1 +/- 6.6
  Background counts = 3.9
  Rate = 0.0008 +/- 0.0001

[Fri Aug 14 05:38:22 2015] Off-axis axis estimate = 12.07'
[Fri Aug 14 05:39:13 2015] Using EEF radius (= 6.51 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Aug 14 05:39:13 2015] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass
[Fri Aug 14 05:39:13 2015] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 6.51"
[Fri Aug 14 05:39:13 2015] source mask rpix=13.2, npix_max = 754, mask sum = 578, frac = 0.766
[Fri Aug 14 05:39:13 2015] Giving source the simple spatial ID 3 for pass 0, mean size = 6.51"
[Fri Aug 14 05:39:14 2015] fullrun_ccd1_acisf15500_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src3.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 14 05:39:14 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd1_acisf15500_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src3.csv
[Fri Aug 14 05:39:14 2015] fullrun_ccd1_acisf15500_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src3_1.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 14 05:39:14 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd1_acisf15500_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src3.csv
[Fri Aug 14 05:39:14 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd1_acisf15500_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src3_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd1_acisf15500_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src3.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Aug 14 05:39:14 2015] fullrun_ccd1_acisf15500_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 14 05:39:14 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd1_acisf15500_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3.csv
[Fri Aug 14 05:39:14 2015] fullrun_ccd1_acisf15500_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3_1.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 14 05:39:14 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd1_acisf15500_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3.csv
[Fri Aug 14 05:39:14 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd1_acisf15500_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd1_acisf15500_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Aug 14 05:39:23 2015] Warning: source 3 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 6 at 42.978865 pixels away
[Fri Aug 14 05:39:23 2015] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Aug 14 05:39:23 2015] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Aug 14 05:39:23 2015] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Aug 14 05:39:23 2015] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Aug 14 05:39:23 2015] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.10
[Fri Aug 14 05:39:42 2015] Using EEF radius (= 6.51 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Aug 14 05:39:42 2015] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass
[Fri Aug 14 05:39:42 2015] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 6.51"
[Fri Aug 14 05:39:42 2015] source mask rpix=13.2, npix_max = 754, mask sum = 578, frac = 0.766
[Fri Aug 14 05:39:42 2015] Giving source the simple spatial ID 3 for pass 1, mean size = 6.51"
[Fri Aug 14 05:50:38 2015] fullrun_ccd1_acisf15500_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src3.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 14 05:50:38 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd1_acisf15500_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src3.csv
[Fri Aug 14 05:50:38 2015] fullrun_ccd1_acisf15500_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src3_1.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 14 05:50:38 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd1_acisf15500_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src3.csv
[Fri Aug 14 05:50:38 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd1_acisf15500_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src3_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd1_acisf15500_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src3.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Aug 14 05:50:38 2015] fullrun_ccd1_acisf15500_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 14 05:50:38 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd1_acisf15500_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3.csv
[Fri Aug 14 05:50:38 2015] fullrun_ccd1_acisf15500_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3_1.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 14 05:50:38 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd1_acisf15500_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3.csv
[Fri Aug 14 05:50:38 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd1_acisf15500_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd1_acisf15500_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Aug 14 06:03:40 2015] Warning: source 3 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 6 at 43.036366 pixels away
[Fri Aug 14 06:03:40 2015] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Aug 14 06:03:40 2015] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Aug 14 06:03:40 2015] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Aug 14 06:03:40 2015] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Aug 14 06:03:40 2015] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.10
[Fri Aug 14 06:03:40 2015] Source is confused with source 7