[Sat Aug 15 00:14:46 2015] Detection parameters:
  Position = (1025.5, 914.5) = 1 13 33.04 -72 36 12.6
  Extent = 0.5" x 0.5", rotation angle = 90 degrees
  Source counts = 38.9 +/- 6.3
  Background counts = 1.1
  Rate = 0.0008 +/- 0.0001

[Sat Aug 15 00:14:47 2015] Off-axis axis estimate = 4.00'
[Sat Aug 15 00:30:06 2015] Using EEF radius (= 0.83 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Aug 15 00:30:06 2015] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.83"
[Sat Aug 15 00:30:06 2015] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 19, frac = 0.994
[Sat Aug 15 00:30:06 2015] Giving source the simple spatial ID 4 for pass 0, mean size = 0.83"
[Sat Aug 15 00:40:58 2015] fullrun_ccd1_acisf15498_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src4.ximg exists
[Sat Aug 15 00:40:58 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd1_acisf15498_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src4.csv
[Sat Aug 15 00:40:58 2015] fullrun_ccd1_acisf15498_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src4_1.ximg exists
[Sat Aug 15 00:40:58 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd1_acisf15498_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src4.csv
[Sat Aug 15 00:40:58 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd1_acisf15498_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src4_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd1_acisf15498_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src4.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Aug 15 00:40:58 2015] fullrun_ccd1_acisf15498_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4.ximg exists
[Sat Aug 15 00:40:58 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd1_acisf15498_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4.csv
[Sat Aug 15 00:40:58 2015] fullrun_ccd1_acisf15498_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4_1.ximg exists
[Sat Aug 15 00:40:58 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd1_acisf15498_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4.csv
[Sat Aug 15 00:40:58 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd1_acisf15498_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd1_acisf15498_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Aug 15 01:04:34 2015] Spatial fit model total counts = 62.458300, observed total counts = 94.000000
[Sat Aug 15 01:04:34 2015] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 4
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sat Aug 15 01:04:34 2015] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Aug 15 01:04:34 2015] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Aug 15 01:04:34 2015] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Aug 15 01:04:34 2015] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Aug 15 01:04:34 2015] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Aug 15 01:14:22 2015] Using EEF radius (= 0.83 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Aug 15 01:14:22 2015] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.83"
[Sat Aug 15 01:14:22 2015] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 19, frac = 0.994
[Sat Aug 15 01:14:22 2015] Giving source the simple spatial ID 4 for pass 1, mean size = 0.83"
[Sat Aug 15 01:21:56 2015] fullrun_ccd1_acisf15498_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src4.ximg exists
[Sat Aug 15 01:21:56 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd1_acisf15498_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src4.csv
[Sat Aug 15 01:21:56 2015] fullrun_ccd1_acisf15498_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src4_1.ximg exists
[Sat Aug 15 01:21:56 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd1_acisf15498_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src4.csv
[Sat Aug 15 01:21:56 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd1_acisf15498_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src4_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd1_acisf15498_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src4.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Aug 15 01:21:56 2015] fullrun_ccd1_acisf15498_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4.ximg exists
[Sat Aug 15 01:21:56 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd1_acisf15498_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4.csv
[Sat Aug 15 01:21:56 2015] fullrun_ccd1_acisf15498_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4_1.ximg exists
[Sat Aug 15 01:21:56 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd1_acisf15498_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4.csv
[Sat Aug 15 01:21:56 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd1_acisf15498_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd1_acisf15498_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Aug 15 01:44:12 2015] Spatial fit model total counts = 62.458300, observed total counts = 94.000000
[Sat Aug 15 01:44:12 2015] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 4
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sat Aug 15 01:44:12 2015] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Aug 15 01:44:12 2015] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Aug 15 01:44:12 2015] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Aug 15 01:44:12 2015] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Aug 15 01:44:12 2015] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00