[Sat Aug 15 00:14:47 2015] Detection parameters:
  Position = (488.2, 1144.5) = 1 14 31.87 -72 34 18.9
  Extent = 0.5" x 0.5", rotation angle = 129 degrees
  Source counts = 11.4 +/- 3.5
  Background counts = 0.6
  Rate = 0.0002 +/- 7e-05

[Sat Aug 15 00:14:47 2015] Off-axis axis estimate = 4.82'
[Sat Aug 15 00:30:06 2015] Using EEF radius (= 1.11 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Aug 15 00:30:06 2015] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 1.11"
[Sat Aug 15 00:30:06 2015] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 30, mask sum = 29, frac = 0.954
[Sat Aug 15 00:30:06 2015] Giving source the simple spatial ID 11 for pass 0, mean size = 1.11"
[Sat Aug 15 00:40:58 2015] fullrun_ccd1_acisf15498_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src11.ximg exists
[Sat Aug 15 00:40:58 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd1_acisf15498_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src11.csv
[Sat Aug 15 00:40:58 2015] fullrun_ccd1_acisf15498_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src11_1.ximg exists
[Sat Aug 15 00:40:58 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd1_acisf15498_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src11.csv
[Sat Aug 15 00:40:58 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd1_acisf15498_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src11_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd1_acisf15498_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src11.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Aug 15 00:40:58 2015] fullrun_ccd1_acisf15498_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src11.ximg exists
[Sat Aug 15 00:40:58 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd1_acisf15498_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src11.csv
[Sat Aug 15 00:40:58 2015] fullrun_ccd1_acisf15498_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src11_1.ximg exists
[Sat Aug 15 00:40:58 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd1_acisf15498_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src11.csv
[Sat Aug 15 00:40:58 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd1_acisf15498_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src11_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd1_acisf15498_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src11.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Aug 15 01:04:34 2015] Spatial fit model total counts = 9.613310, observed total counts = 16.000000
[Sat Aug 15 01:04:34 2015] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 11
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sat Aug 15 01:04:34 2015] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Aug 15 01:04:34 2015] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Aug 15 01:04:34 2015] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Aug 15 01:04:34 2015] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Aug 15 01:04:34 2015] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Aug 15 01:14:22 2015] Using EEF radius (= 1.11 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Aug 15 01:14:22 2015] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 1.11"
[Sat Aug 15 01:14:22 2015] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 30, mask sum = 29, frac = 0.954
[Sat Aug 15 01:14:22 2015] Giving source the simple spatial ID 11 for pass 1, mean size = 1.11"
[Sat Aug 15 01:21:56 2015] fullrun_ccd1_acisf15498_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src11.ximg exists
[Sat Aug 15 01:21:56 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd1_acisf15498_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src11.csv
[Sat Aug 15 01:21:56 2015] fullrun_ccd1_acisf15498_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src11_1.ximg exists
[Sat Aug 15 01:21:56 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd1_acisf15498_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src11.csv
[Sat Aug 15 01:21:56 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd1_acisf15498_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src11_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd1_acisf15498_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src11.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Aug 15 01:21:56 2015] fullrun_ccd1_acisf15498_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11.ximg exists
[Sat Aug 15 01:21:56 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd1_acisf15498_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11.csv
[Sat Aug 15 01:21:56 2015] fullrun_ccd1_acisf15498_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11_1.ximg exists
[Sat Aug 15 01:21:56 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd1_acisf15498_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11.csv
[Sat Aug 15 01:21:56 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd1_acisf15498_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd1_acisf15498_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Aug 15 01:44:12 2015] Spatial fit model total counts = 9.613310, observed total counts = 16.000000
[Sat Aug 15 01:44:12 2015] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 11
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sat Aug 15 01:44:12 2015] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Aug 15 01:44:12 2015] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Aug 15 01:44:12 2015] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Aug 15 01:44:12 2015] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Aug 15 01:44:12 2015] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00