[Fri Aug 14 00:20:55 2015] Detection parameters:
  Position = (703.5, 900.0) = 1 11 24.77 -72 36 34.4
  Extent = 0.8" x 0.7", rotation angle = 156 degrees
  Source counts = 10.6 +/- 3.3
  Background counts = 0.4
  Rate = 0.0006 +/- 0.0002

[Fri Aug 14 00:20:56 2015] Off-axis axis estimate = 7.11'
[Fri Aug 14 00:21:26 2015] Using EEF radius (= 2.25 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Aug 14 00:21:26 2015] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass
[Fri Aug 14 00:21:26 2015] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 2.25"
[Fri Aug 14 00:21:26 2015] source mask rpix=4.6, npix_max = 102, mask sum = 110, frac = 1.071
[Fri Aug 14 00:21:26 2015] Giving source the simple spatial ID 3 for pass 0, mean size = 2.25"
[Fri Aug 14 00:21:26 2015] fullrun_ccd2_acisf15497_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src3.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 14 00:21:26 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd2_acisf15497_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src3.csv
[Fri Aug 14 00:21:26 2015] fullrun_ccd2_acisf15497_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src3_1.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 14 00:21:26 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd2_acisf15497_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src3.csv
[Fri Aug 14 00:21:26 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd2_acisf15497_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src3_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd2_acisf15497_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src3.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Aug 14 00:21:26 2015] fullrun_ccd2_acisf15497_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 14 00:21:26 2015] fullrun_ccd2_acisf15497_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3_1.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 14 00:21:26 2015] Fit fullrun_ccd2_acisf15497_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3 appears to have run properly
[Fri Aug 14 00:21:30 2015] Spatial fit model total counts = 15.273300, observed total counts = 18.000000
[Fri Aug 14 00:21:30 2015] Offset between fit and detection position for source 2 = 1.347729 pixels
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 2 = 1.347729 pixels
  Position = (704.6, 900.7) = 1 11 24.78 -72 36 34.3
  Extent = 2.1 (1.7-4.2)" x 0.9 (0.6-1.3)", rotation angle = 352 (325-8) degrees
  Source counts = 15.4 +/- 3.9
  Background counts = 0.0
  Rate = 0.0009 +/- 0.0002
[Fri Aug 14 00:21:30 2015] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Aug 14 00:21:30 2015] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Aug 14 00:21:30 2015] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Fri Aug 14 00:21:30 2015] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Aug 14 00:21:30 2015] Computing asymmetry using errors on major and minor axis (from spatial fitting), asym = 1.35
[Fri Aug 14 00:21:43 2015] Using previous fit value to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Aug 14 00:21:43 2015] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 1.51"
[Fri Aug 14 00:21:43 2015] source mask rpix=3.1, npix_max = 50, mask sum = 49, frac = 0.965
[Fri Aug 14 00:21:43 2015] Giving source the simple spatial ID 3 for pass 1, mean size = 1.51"
[Fri Aug 14 00:21:43 2015] fullrun_ccd2_acisf15497_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src3.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 14 00:21:43 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd2_acisf15497_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src3.csv
[Fri Aug 14 00:21:43 2015] fullrun_ccd2_acisf15497_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src3_1.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 14 00:21:43 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd2_acisf15497_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src3.csv
[Fri Aug 14 00:21:43 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd2_acisf15497_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src3_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd2_acisf15497_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src3.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Aug 14 00:21:43 2015] fullrun_ccd2_acisf15497_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 14 00:21:43 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd2_acisf15497_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3.csv
[Fri Aug 14 00:21:43 2015] fullrun_ccd2_acisf15497_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3_1.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 14 00:21:43 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd2_acisf15497_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3.csv
[Fri Aug 14 00:21:43 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd2_acisf15497_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd2_acisf15497_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Aug 14 00:21:47 2015] Spatial fit model total counts = 13.446800, observed total counts = 15.000000
[Fri Aug 14 00:21:47 2015] Offset between fit and detection position for source 2 = 0.988418 pixels
[Fri Aug 14 00:21:47 2015] 13.794053 total counts/ 0.269253 bgd. counts: snr = 26.064571
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 2 = 0.988418 pixels
  Position = (703.6, 900.8) = 1 11 24.89 -72 36 34.3
  Extent = 1.4 (0.8-1.8)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 13.5 +/- 3.7
  Background counts = 0.3
  Rate = 0.0008 +/- 0.0002
[Fri Aug 14 00:21:47 2015] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Aug 14 00:21:47 2015] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Aug 14 00:21:47 2015] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Fri Aug 14 00:21:47 2015] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Aug 14 00:21:47 2015] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00