[Sun Jun 21 12:05:04 2015] Detection parameters:
  Position = (652.8, 553.2) = 13 29 52.73 47 10 51.4
  Extent = 0.5" x 0.5", rotation angle = 153 degrees
  Source counts = 33.1 +/- 6.0
  Background counts = 2.9
  Rate = 0.0008 +/- 0.0001

[Sun Jun 21 12:05:06 2015] Off-axis axis estimate = 1.89'
[Sun Jun 21 12:21:37 2015] Using EEF radius (= 0.42 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Jun 21 12:21:37 2015] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.42"
[Sun Jun 21 12:21:37 2015] source mask rpix=0.9, npix_max = 7, mask sum = 9, frac = 1.231
[Sun Jun 21 12:21:37 2015] Giving source the simple spatial ID 42 for pass 0, mean size = 0.42"
[Sun Jun 21 13:17:37 2015] fullrun_ccd7_acisf15496_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src42.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 21 13:17:37 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf15496_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src42.csv
[Sun Jun 21 13:17:37 2015] fullrun_ccd7_acisf15496_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src42_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 21 13:17:37 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf15496_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src42.csv
[Sun Jun 21 13:17:37 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd7_acisf15496_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src42_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd7_acisf15496_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src42.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun 21 13:17:37 2015] fullrun_ccd7_acisf15496_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src42.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 21 13:17:37 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf15496_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src42.csv
[Sun Jun 21 13:17:37 2015] fullrun_ccd7_acisf15496_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src42_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 21 13:17:37 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf15496_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src42.csv
[Sun Jun 21 13:17:37 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd7_acisf15496_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src42_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd7_acisf15496_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src42.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun 21 13:17:54 2015] Spatial fit model total counts = 33.130600, observed total counts = 41.000000
[Sun Jun 21 13:17:54 2015] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 47
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sun Jun 21 13:17:54 2015] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Jun 21 13:17:54 2015] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Jun 21 13:17:54 2015] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Jun 21 13:17:54 2015] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Jun 21 13:17:54 2015] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.04
[Sun Jun 21 13:33:26 2015] Using EEF radius (= 0.42 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Jun 21 13:33:26 2015] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.42"
[Sun Jun 21 13:33:26 2015] source mask rpix=0.9, npix_max = 7, mask sum = 9, frac = 1.231
[Sun Jun 21 13:33:26 2015] Giving source the simple spatial ID 41 for pass 1, mean size = 0.42"
[Sun Jun 21 14:27:07 2015] fullrun_ccd7_acisf15496_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src41.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 21 14:27:07 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf15496_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src41.csv
[Sun Jun 21 14:27:07 2015] fullrun_ccd7_acisf15496_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src41_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 21 14:27:07 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf15496_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src41.csv
[Sun Jun 21 14:27:07 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd7_acisf15496_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src41_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd7_acisf15496_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src41.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun 21 14:27:07 2015] fullrun_ccd7_acisf15496_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src41.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 21 14:27:07 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf15496_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src41.csv
[Sun Jun 21 14:27:07 2015] fullrun_ccd7_acisf15496_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src41_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 21 14:27:07 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf15496_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src41.csv
[Sun Jun 21 14:27:07 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd7_acisf15496_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src41_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd7_acisf15496_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src41.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun 21 14:27:22 2015] Spatial fit model total counts = 33.130600, observed total counts = 41.000000
[Sun Jun 21 14:27:22 2015] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 47
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sun Jun 21 14:27:22 2015] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Jun 21 14:27:22 2015] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Jun 21 14:27:22 2015] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Jun 21 14:27:22 2015] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Jun 21 14:27:22 2015] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.04