[Sun Jun 21 12:05:04 2015] Detection parameters:
  Position = (553.5, 1204.5) = 13 29 57.51 47 16 11.9
  Extent = 0.5" x 0.5", rotation angle = 90 degrees
  Source counts = 53.0 +/- 7.8
  Background counts = 8.0
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0002

[Sun Jun 21 12:05:06 2015] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.37'
[Sun Jun 21 12:21:37 2015] Using EEF radius (= 1.33 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Jun 21 12:21:37 2015] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 1.33"
[Sun Jun 21 12:21:37 2015] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 41, mask sum = 31, frac = 0.751
[Sun Jun 21 12:21:37 2015] Giving source the simple spatial ID 30 for pass 0, mean size = 1.33"
[Sun Jun 21 13:17:36 2015] fullrun_ccd7_acisf15496_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src30.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 21 13:17:36 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf15496_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src30.csv
[Sun Jun 21 13:17:36 2015] fullrun_ccd7_acisf15496_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src30_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 21 13:17:36 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf15496_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src30.csv
[Sun Jun 21 13:17:36 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd7_acisf15496_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src30_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd7_acisf15496_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src30.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun 21 13:17:37 2015] fullrun_ccd7_acisf15496_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src30.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 21 13:17:37 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf15496_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src30.csv
[Sun Jun 21 13:17:37 2015] fullrun_ccd7_acisf15496_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src30_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 21 13:17:37 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf15496_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src30.csv
[Sun Jun 21 13:17:37 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd7_acisf15496_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src30_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd7_acisf15496_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src30.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun 21 13:17:54 2015] Spatial fit model total counts = 55.148900, observed total counts = 109.000000
[Sun Jun 21 13:17:54 2015] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 30
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sun Jun 21 13:17:54 2015] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Jun 21 13:17:54 2015] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Jun 21 13:17:54 2015] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Jun 21 13:17:54 2015] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Jun 21 13:17:54 2015] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Jun 21 13:33:26 2015] Using EEF radius (= 1.33 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Jun 21 13:33:26 2015] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 1.33"
[Sun Jun 21 13:33:26 2015] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 41, mask sum = 31, frac = 0.751
[Sun Jun 21 13:33:26 2015] Giving source the simple spatial ID 29 for pass 1, mean size = 1.33"
[Sun Jun 21 14:27:07 2015] fullrun_ccd7_acisf15496_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src29.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 21 14:27:07 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf15496_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src29.csv
[Sun Jun 21 14:27:07 2015] fullrun_ccd7_acisf15496_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src29_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 21 14:27:07 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf15496_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src29.csv
[Sun Jun 21 14:27:07 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd7_acisf15496_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src29_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd7_acisf15496_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src29.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun 21 14:27:07 2015] fullrun_ccd7_acisf15496_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src29.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 21 14:27:07 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf15496_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src29.csv
[Sun Jun 21 14:27:07 2015] fullrun_ccd7_acisf15496_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src29_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 21 14:27:07 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf15496_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src29.csv
[Sun Jun 21 14:27:07 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd7_acisf15496_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src29_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd7_acisf15496_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src29.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun 21 14:27:22 2015] Spatial fit model total counts = 55.148900, observed total counts = 109.000000
[Sun Jun 21 14:27:22 2015] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 30
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sun Jun 21 14:27:22 2015] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Jun 21 14:27:22 2015] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Jun 21 14:27:22 2015] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Jun 21 14:27:22 2015] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Jun 21 14:27:22 2015] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00