[Mon May 11 16:46:16 2015] Detection parameters:
  Position = (584.3, 251.4) = 13 37 25.10 8 58 11.4
  Extent = 0.5" x 0.5", rotation angle = 31 degrees
  Source counts = 56.4 +/- 7.5
  Background counts = 0.6
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0002

[Mon May 11 16:46:17 2015] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.31'
[Mon May 11 16:55:39 2015] Using EEF radius (= 0.47 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon May 11 16:55:39 2015] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.47"
[Mon May 11 16:55:39 2015] source mask rpix=0.9, npix_max = 8, mask sum = 6, frac = 0.718
[Mon May 11 16:55:39 2015] Giving source the simple spatial ID 5 for pass 0, mean size = 0.47"
[Mon May 11 17:12:53 2015] fullrun_ccd2_acisf15386_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src5.ximg exists
[Mon May 11 17:12:53 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd2_acisf15386_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src5.csv
[Mon May 11 17:12:53 2015] fullrun_ccd2_acisf15386_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src5_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 11 17:12:53 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd2_acisf15386_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src5.csv
[Mon May 11 17:12:53 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd2_acisf15386_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src5_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd2_acisf15386_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 11 17:12:53 2015] fullrun_ccd2_acisf15386_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.ximg exists
[Mon May 11 17:12:53 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd2_acisf15386_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.csv
[Mon May 11 17:12:53 2015] fullrun_ccd2_acisf15386_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 11 17:12:53 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd2_acisf15386_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.csv
[Mon May 11 17:12:53 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd2_acisf15386_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd2_acisf15386_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 11 17:38:49 2015] Spatial fit model total counts = 56.517400, observed total counts = 71.000000
[Mon May 11 17:38:49 2015] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 6
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Mon May 11 17:38:49 2015] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon May 11 17:38:49 2015] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon May 11 17:38:49 2015] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon May 11 17:38:49 2015] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon May 11 17:38:49 2015] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon May 11 17:43:51 2015] Using EEF radius (= 0.47 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon May 11 17:43:51 2015] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.47"
[Mon May 11 17:43:51 2015] source mask rpix=0.9, npix_max = 8, mask sum = 6, frac = 0.718
[Mon May 11 17:43:51 2015] Giving source the simple spatial ID 5 for pass 1, mean size = 0.47"
[Mon May 11 18:00:19 2015] fullrun_ccd2_acisf15386_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src5.ximg exists
[Mon May 11 18:00:19 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd2_acisf15386_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src5.csv
[Mon May 11 18:00:19 2015] fullrun_ccd2_acisf15386_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src5_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 11 18:00:19 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd2_acisf15386_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src5.csv
[Mon May 11 18:00:19 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd2_acisf15386_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src5_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd2_acisf15386_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 11 18:00:19 2015] fullrun_ccd2_acisf15386_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.ximg exists
[Mon May 11 18:00:19 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd2_acisf15386_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.csv
[Mon May 11 18:00:19 2015] fullrun_ccd2_acisf15386_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 11 18:00:19 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd2_acisf15386_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.csv
[Mon May 11 18:00:19 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd2_acisf15386_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd2_acisf15386_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 11 18:21:43 2015] Spatial fit model total counts = 56.517400, observed total counts = 71.000000
[Mon May 11 18:21:43 2015] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 6
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Mon May 11 18:21:43 2015] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon May 11 18:21:43 2015] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon May 11 18:21:43 2015] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon May 11 18:21:43 2015] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon May 11 18:21:43 2015] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00