[Mon May 11 16:46:16 2015] Detection parameters:
  Position = (846.8, 375.7) = 13 37 16.38 8 59 12.5
  Extent = 0.5" x 0.5", rotation angle = 29 degrees
  Source counts = 12.0 +/- 3.6
  Background counts = 1.0
  Rate = 0.0002 +/- 7e-05

[Mon May 11 16:46:17 2015] Off-axis axis estimate = 4.56'
[Mon May 11 16:55:39 2015] Using EEF radius (= 1.01 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon May 11 16:55:39 2015] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 1.01"
[Mon May 11 16:55:39 2015] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 26, mask sum = 20, frac = 0.762
[Mon May 11 16:55:39 2015] Giving source the simple spatial ID 25 for pass 0, mean size = 1.01"
[Mon May 11 17:12:53 2015] fullrun_ccd2_acisf15386_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src25.ximg exists
[Mon May 11 17:12:53 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd2_acisf15386_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src25.csv
[Mon May 11 17:12:53 2015] fullrun_ccd2_acisf15386_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src25_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 11 17:12:53 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd2_acisf15386_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src25.csv
[Mon May 11 17:12:53 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd2_acisf15386_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src25_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd2_acisf15386_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src25.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 11 17:12:53 2015] fullrun_ccd2_acisf15386_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src25.ximg exists
[Mon May 11 17:12:53 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd2_acisf15386_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src25.csv
[Mon May 11 17:12:53 2015] fullrun_ccd2_acisf15386_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src25_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 11 17:12:53 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd2_acisf15386_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src25.csv
[Mon May 11 17:12:53 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd2_acisf15386_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src25_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd2_acisf15386_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src25.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 11 17:38:49 2015] Spatial fit model total counts = 21.076500, observed total counts = 26.000000
[Mon May 11 17:38:49 2015] Offset between fit and detection position for source 17 = 0.286426 pixels
[Mon May 11 17:38:49 2015] 24.800800 total counts/ 11.534000 bgd. counts: snr = 3.906395
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 17 = 0.286426 pixels
  Position = (847.0, 375.5) = 13 37 16.39 8 59 12.2
  Extent = 0.5 (0.4-0.9)", rotation angle = 11 (336-46) degrees
  Source counts = 13.3 +/- 5.0
  Background counts = 11.5
  Rate = 0.0003 +/- 0.0001
[Mon May 11 17:38:49 2015] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon May 11 17:38:49 2015] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon May 11 17:38:49 2015] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Mon May 11 17:38:49 2015] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon May 11 17:38:49 2015] Computing asymmetry using errors on major and minor axis (from spatial fitting), asym = 0.89
[Mon May 11 17:43:51 2015] Using previous fit value to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon May 11 17:43:51 2015] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.38"
[Mon May 11 17:43:51 2015] source mask rpix=0.8, npix_max = 6, mask sum = 3, frac = 0.465
[Mon May 11 17:43:51 2015] Skipping simple spatial due to low active detector fraction
[Mon May 11 18:21:43 2015] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon May 11 18:21:43 2015] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon May 11 18:21:43 2015] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Mon May 11 18:21:43 2015] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon May 11 18:21:43 2015] Computing asymmetry using errors on major and minor axis (from spatial fitting), asym = 0.89