[Fri Aug 14 00:24:50 2015] Detection parameters:
  Position = (541.2, 274.4) = 0 42 30.28 41 16 53.1
  Extent = 0.9" x 0.5", rotation angle = 79 degrees
  Source counts = 15.3 +/- 4.0
  Background counts = 0.7
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0004

[Fri Aug 14 00:24:52 2015] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.59'
[Fri Aug 14 00:25:31 2015] Using EEF radius (= 0.51 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Aug 14 00:25:31 2015] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.51"
[Fri Aug 14 00:25:31 2015] source mask rpix=1.0, npix_max = 9, mask sum = 9, frac = 0.963
[Fri Aug 14 00:25:31 2015] Giving source the simple spatial ID 16 for pass 0, mean size = 0.51"
[Fri Aug 14 00:25:32 2015] fullrun_ccd6_acisf15267_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src16.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 14 00:25:32 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd6_acisf15267_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src16.csv
[Fri Aug 14 00:25:32 2015] fullrun_ccd6_acisf15267_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src16_1.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 14 00:25:32 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd6_acisf15267_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src16.csv
[Fri Aug 14 00:25:32 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd6_acisf15267_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src16_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd6_acisf15267_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src16.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Aug 14 00:25:32 2015] fullrun_ccd6_acisf15267_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src16.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 14 00:25:32 2015] fullrun_ccd6_acisf15267_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src16_1.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 14 00:25:32 2015] Fit fullrun_ccd6_acisf15267_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src16 appears to have run properly
[Fri Aug 14 00:25:40 2015] Spatial fit model total counts = 15.882400, observed total counts = 16.000000
[Fri Aug 14 00:25:40 2015] Offset between fit and detection position for source 3 = 1.640764 pixels
[Fri Aug 14 00:25:40 2015] 15.427190 total counts/ 2.374190 bgd. counts: snr = 8.471350
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 3 = 1.640764 pixels
  Position = (541.9, 275.8) = 0 42 30.28 41 16 53.6
  Extent = 0.5 (0.4-0.6)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 13.1 +/- 3.9
  Background counts = 2.4
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0004
[Fri Aug 14 00:25:40 2015] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Aug 14 00:25:40 2015] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Aug 14 00:25:40 2015] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Fri Aug 14 00:25:40 2015] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Aug 14 00:25:40 2015] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Aug 14 00:26:04 2015] Using previous fit value to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Aug 14 00:26:04 2015] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.51"
[Fri Aug 14 00:26:04 2015] source mask rpix=1.0, npix_max = 9, mask sum = 9, frac = 0.965
[Fri Aug 14 00:26:04 2015] Giving source the simple spatial ID 16 for pass 1, mean size = 0.51"
[Fri Aug 14 00:26:05 2015] fullrun_ccd6_acisf15267_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src16.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 14 00:26:05 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd6_acisf15267_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src16.csv
[Fri Aug 14 00:26:05 2015] fullrun_ccd6_acisf15267_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src16_1.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 14 00:26:05 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd6_acisf15267_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src16.csv
[Fri Aug 14 00:26:05 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd6_acisf15267_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src16_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd6_acisf15267_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src16.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Aug 14 00:26:05 2015] fullrun_ccd6_acisf15267_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 14 00:26:05 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd6_acisf15267_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16.csv
[Fri Aug 14 00:26:05 2015] fullrun_ccd6_acisf15267_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16_1.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 14 00:26:05 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd6_acisf15267_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16.csv
[Fri Aug 14 00:26:05 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd6_acisf15267_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd6_acisf15267_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Aug 14 00:26:13 2015] Spatial fit model total counts = 14.038100, observed total counts = 16.000000
[Fri Aug 14 00:26:13 2015] Offset between fit and detection position for source 3 = 0.060431 pixels
[Fri Aug 14 00:26:13 2015] 13.313800 total counts/ 0.000000 bgd. counts: snr = 1465992173283.587891
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 3 = 0.060431 pixels
  Position = (541.9, 275.9) = 0 42 30.28 41 16 53.6
  Extent = 0.6 (0.4-0.8)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 13.3 +/- 3.6
  Background counts = 0.0
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0003
[Fri Aug 14 00:26:13 2015] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Aug 14 00:26:13 2015] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Aug 14 00:26:13 2015] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Fri Aug 14 00:26:13 2015] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Aug 14 00:26:13 2015] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00