[Fri Aug 14 00:24:51 2015] Detection parameters:
  Position = (519.5, 611.5) = 0 42 31.22 41 19 39.0
  Extent = 0.5" x 0.5", rotation angle = 90 degrees
  Source counts = 69.5 +/- 8.5
  Background counts = 2.5
  Rate = 0.006 +/- 0.0008

[Fri Aug 14 00:24:52 2015] Off-axis axis estimate = 4.22'
[Fri Aug 14 00:25:31 2015] Using EEF radius (= 0.90 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Aug 14 00:25:31 2015] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.90"
[Fri Aug 14 00:25:31 2015] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 21, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.741
[Fri Aug 14 00:25:31 2015] Giving source the simple spatial ID 11 for pass 0, mean size = 0.90"
[Fri Aug 14 00:25:32 2015] fullrun_ccd6_acisf15267_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src11.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 14 00:25:32 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd6_acisf15267_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src11.csv
[Fri Aug 14 00:25:32 2015] fullrun_ccd6_acisf15267_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src11_1.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 14 00:25:32 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd6_acisf15267_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src11.csv
[Fri Aug 14 00:25:32 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd6_acisf15267_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src11_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd6_acisf15267_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src11.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Aug 14 00:25:32 2015] fullrun_ccd6_acisf15267_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src11.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 14 00:25:32 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd6_acisf15267_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src11.csv
[Fri Aug 14 00:25:32 2015] fullrun_ccd6_acisf15267_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src11_1.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 14 00:25:32 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd6_acisf15267_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src11.csv
[Fri Aug 14 00:25:32 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd6_acisf15267_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src11_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd6_acisf15267_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src11.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Aug 14 00:25:40 2015] Spatial fit model total counts = 129.802000, observed total counts = 173.000000
[Fri Aug 14 00:25:40 2015] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 11
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Fri Aug 14 00:25:40 2015] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Aug 14 00:25:40 2015] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Aug 14 00:25:40 2015] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Aug 14 00:25:40 2015] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Aug 14 00:25:40 2015] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Aug 14 00:26:04 2015] Using EEF radius (= 0.90 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Aug 14 00:26:04 2015] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.90"
[Fri Aug 14 00:26:04 2015] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 21, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.741
[Fri Aug 14 00:26:04 2015] Giving source the simple spatial ID 11 for pass 1, mean size = 0.90"
[Fri Aug 14 00:26:05 2015] fullrun_ccd6_acisf15267_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src11.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 14 00:26:05 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd6_acisf15267_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src11.csv
[Fri Aug 14 00:26:05 2015] fullrun_ccd6_acisf15267_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src11_1.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 14 00:26:05 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd6_acisf15267_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src11.csv
[Fri Aug 14 00:26:05 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd6_acisf15267_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src11_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd6_acisf15267_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src11.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Aug 14 00:26:05 2015] fullrun_ccd6_acisf15267_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 14 00:26:05 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd6_acisf15267_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11.csv
[Fri Aug 14 00:26:05 2015] fullrun_ccd6_acisf15267_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11_1.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 14 00:26:05 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd6_acisf15267_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11.csv
[Fri Aug 14 00:26:05 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd6_acisf15267_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd6_acisf15267_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Aug 14 00:26:13 2015] Spatial fit model total counts = 129.802000, observed total counts = 173.000000
[Fri Aug 14 00:26:13 2015] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 11
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Fri Aug 14 00:26:13 2015] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Aug 14 00:26:13 2015] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Aug 14 00:26:13 2015] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Aug 14 00:26:13 2015] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Aug 14 00:26:13 2015] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00