[Sat Aug 15 03:41:04 2015] Detection parameters:
  Position = (530.5, 707.5) = 6 21 49.61 74 42 4.6
  Extent = 0.5" x 0.5", rotation angle = 90 degrees
  Source counts = 33.6 +/- 6.8
  Background counts = 12.4
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0004

[Sat Aug 15 03:41:04 2015] Off-axis axis estimate = 3.21'
[Sat Aug 15 03:48:27 2015] Using EEF radius (= 0.62 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Aug 15 03:48:27 2015] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.62"
[Sat Aug 15 03:48:27 2015] source mask rpix=1.3, npix_max = 12, mask sum = 9, frac = 0.718
[Sat Aug 15 03:48:27 2015] Giving source the simple spatial ID 2 for pass 0, mean size = 0.62"
[Sat Aug 15 03:51:24 2015] fullrun_ccd3_acisf15139_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src2.ximg exists
[Sat Aug 15 03:51:24 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf15139_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src2.csv
[Sat Aug 15 03:51:24 2015] fullrun_ccd3_acisf15139_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src2_1.ximg exists
[Sat Aug 15 03:51:24 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf15139_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src2.csv
[Sat Aug 15 03:51:24 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd3_acisf15139_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src2_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd3_acisf15139_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src2.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Aug 15 03:51:24 2015] fullrun_ccd3_acisf15139_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2.ximg exists
[Sat Aug 15 03:51:24 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf15139_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2.csv
[Sat Aug 15 03:51:24 2015] fullrun_ccd3_acisf15139_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2_1.ximg exists
[Sat Aug 15 03:51:24 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf15139_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2.csv
[Sat Aug 15 03:51:24 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd3_acisf15139_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd3_acisf15139_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Aug 15 03:51:28 2015] Spatial fit model total counts = 291.860000, observed total counts = 382.000000
[Sat Aug 15 03:51:28 2015] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 5
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sat Aug 15 03:51:28 2015] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Aug 15 03:51:28 2015] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Aug 15 03:51:28 2015] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Aug 15 03:51:28 2015] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Aug 15 03:51:28 2015] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Aug 15 03:56:23 2015] Using EEF radius (= 0.62 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Aug 15 03:56:23 2015] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.62"
[Sat Aug 15 03:56:23 2015] source mask rpix=1.3, npix_max = 12, mask sum = 9, frac = 0.718
[Sat Aug 15 03:56:23 2015] Giving source the simple spatial ID 2 for pass 1, mean size = 0.62"
[Sat Aug 15 03:58:52 2015] fullrun_ccd3_acisf15139_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src2.ximg exists
[Sat Aug 15 03:58:52 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf15139_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src2.csv
[Sat Aug 15 03:58:52 2015] fullrun_ccd3_acisf15139_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src2_1.ximg exists
[Sat Aug 15 03:58:52 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf15139_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src2.csv
[Sat Aug 15 03:58:52 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd3_acisf15139_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src2_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd3_acisf15139_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src2.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Aug 15 03:58:52 2015] fullrun_ccd3_acisf15139_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2.ximg exists
[Sat Aug 15 03:58:52 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf15139_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2.csv
[Sat Aug 15 03:58:52 2015] fullrun_ccd3_acisf15139_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2_1.ximg exists
[Sat Aug 15 03:58:52 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf15139_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2.csv
[Sat Aug 15 03:58:52 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd3_acisf15139_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd3_acisf15139_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Aug 15 03:58:56 2015] Spatial fit model total counts = 291.860000, observed total counts = 382.000000
[Sat Aug 15 03:58:56 2015] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 5
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sat Aug 15 03:58:56 2015] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Aug 15 03:58:56 2015] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Aug 15 03:58:56 2015] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Aug 15 03:58:56 2015] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Aug 15 03:58:56 2015] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00