[Tue Dec 1 02:24:03 2009] Detection parameters: Position = (673.5, 657.5) = 3 19 44.64 41 31 6.1 Extent = 0.5" x 0.5", rotation angle = 139 degrees Source counts = 102.1 +/- 25.8 Background counts = 565.9 Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.001 [Tue Dec 1 02:24:10 2009] Off-axis axis estimate = 3.08' [Tue Dec 1 02:56:13 2009] Using EEF radius (= 0.60 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Tue Dec 1 02:56:13 2009] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.60" [Tue Dec 1 02:56:13 2009] source mask rpix=1.2, npix_max = 11, mask sum = 9, frac = 0.768 [Tue Dec 1 02:56:13 2009] Giving source the simple spatial ID 16 for pass 0, mean size = 0.60" [Tue Dec 1 03:53:39 2009] fullrun_ccd7_acisf01513_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src16.ximg exists [Tue Dec 1 03:53:39 2009] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf01513_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src16.csv [Tue Dec 1 03:53:39 2009] fullrun_ccd7_acisf01513_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src16_1.ximg exists [Tue Dec 1 03:53:39 2009] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf01513_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src16.csv [Tue Dec 1 03:53:39 2009] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_ccd7_acisf01513_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src16_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd7_acisf01513_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src16.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue Dec 1 03:53:39 2009] fullrun_ccd7_acisf01513_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src16.ximg exists [Tue Dec 1 03:53:39 2009] fullrun_ccd7_acisf01513_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src16_1.ximg exists [Tue Dec 1 03:53:39 2009] Fit fullrun_ccd7_acisf01513_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src16 appears to have run properly [Tue Dec 1 03:53:52 2009] Source 20 is offset by -4.032561 and -5.382211 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 1.238083 x 1.238083, not incorporating fit results [Tue Dec 1 03:53:52 2009] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Tue Dec 1 03:53:52 2009] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Tue Dec 1 03:53:52 2009] Assessing source extent using major [Tue Dec 1 03:53:52 2009] Source does appear to be extended [Tue Dec 1 03:53:52 2009] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.09 [Tue Dec 1 03:59:30 2009] Using EEF radius (= 0.60 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Tue Dec 1 03:59:30 2009] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.60" [Tue Dec 1 03:59:30 2009] source mask rpix=1.2, npix_max = 11, mask sum = 9, frac = 0.768 [Tue Dec 1 03:59:30 2009] Giving source the simple spatial ID 15 for pass 1, mean size = 0.60" [Tue Dec 1 04:17:38 2009] fullrun_ccd7_acisf01513_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src15.ximg exists [Tue Dec 1 04:17:38 2009] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf01513_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src15.csv [Tue Dec 1 04:17:38 2009] fullrun_ccd7_acisf01513_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src15_1.ximg exists [Tue Dec 1 04:17:38 2009] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf01513_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src15.csv [Tue Dec 1 04:17:38 2009] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_ccd7_acisf01513_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src15_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd7_acisf01513_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src15.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue Dec 1 04:17:38 2009] fullrun_ccd7_acisf01513_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src15.ximg exists [Tue Dec 1 04:17:38 2009] fullrun_ccd7_acisf01513_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src15_1.ximg exists [Tue Dec 1 04:17:38 2009] Fit fullrun_ccd7_acisf01513_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src15 appears to have run properly [Tue Dec 1 04:17:43 2009] Warning: source 6 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 20 at 51.240728 pixels away [Tue Dec 1 04:17:43 2009] Warning: source 7 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 20 at 55.543685 pixels away [Tue Dec 1 04:17:43 2009] Warning: source 9 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 20 at 45.679547 pixels away [Tue Dec 1 04:17:43 2009] Warning: source 10 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 20 at 82.366885 pixels away [Tue Dec 1 04:17:43 2009] Spatial fit model total counts = 2160.480000, observed total counts = 2160.000000 [Tue Dec 1 04:17:43 2009] Offset between fit and detection position for source 20 = 7.556212 pixels [Tue Dec 1 04:17:43 2009] 2167.460042 total counts/ 2167.460000 bgd. counts: snr = 0.000001 Spatial fit parameters: Offset between fit and detection position for source 20 = 7.556212 pixels Position = (668.2, 662.8) = 3 19 44.89 41 31 8.5 Extent = 1.5 (1.5-3.0)", rotation angle = 0 Source counts = 0.0 +/- 46.6 Background counts = 2167.5 Rate = 2e-09 +/- 0.002 Deleting source due to low Poisson probability