[Fri Aug 14 23:54:28 2015] Detection parameters:
  Position = (214.1, 801.6) = 14 15 18.95 71 12 5.4
  Extent = 1.2" x 0.6", rotation angle = 96 degrees
  Source counts = 36.3 +/- 6.1
  Background counts = 0.7
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0003

[Fri Aug 14 23:54:29 2015] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.56'
[Fri Aug 14 23:57:27 2015] Using EEF radius (= 1.42 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Aug 14 23:57:27 2015] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass
[Fri Aug 14 23:57:27 2015] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 1.42"
[Fri Aug 14 23:57:27 2015] source mask rpix=2.9, npix_max = 45, mask sum = 42, frac = 0.917
[Fri Aug 14 23:57:27 2015] Giving source the simple spatial ID 2 for pass 0, mean size = 1.42"
[Sat Aug 15 00:01:03 2015] fullrun_ccd2_acisf15129_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src2.ximg exists
[Sat Aug 15 00:01:03 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd2_acisf15129_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src2.csv
[Sat Aug 15 00:01:03 2015] fullrun_ccd2_acisf15129_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src2_1.ximg exists
[Sat Aug 15 00:01:03 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd2_acisf15129_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src2.csv
[Sat Aug 15 00:01:03 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd2_acisf15129_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src2_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd2_acisf15129_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src2.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Aug 15 00:01:03 2015] fullrun_ccd2_acisf15129_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2.ximg exists
[Sat Aug 15 00:01:03 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd2_acisf15129_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2.csv
[Sat Aug 15 00:01:03 2015] fullrun_ccd2_acisf15129_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2_1.ximg exists
[Sat Aug 15 00:01:03 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd2_acisf15129_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2.csv
[Sat Aug 15 00:01:03 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd2_acisf15129_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd2_acisf15129_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Aug 15 00:05:01 2015] Spatial fit model total counts = 46.286000, observed total counts = 54.000000
[Sat Aug 15 00:05:01 2015] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 2
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sat Aug 15 00:05:01 2015] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Aug 15 00:05:01 2015] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Aug 15 00:05:01 2015] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Aug 15 00:05:01 2015] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Aug 15 00:05:01 2015] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 2.13
[Sat Aug 15 00:05:01 2015] Source is asymmetric
[Sat Aug 15 00:05:12 2015] Using EEF radius (= 1.42 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Aug 15 00:05:12 2015] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass
[Sat Aug 15 00:05:12 2015] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 1.42"
[Sat Aug 15 00:05:12 2015] source mask rpix=2.9, npix_max = 45, mask sum = 42, frac = 0.917
[Sat Aug 15 00:05:12 2015] Giving source the simple spatial ID 2 for pass 1, mean size = 1.42"
[Sat Aug 15 00:09:18 2015] fullrun_ccd2_acisf15129_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src2.ximg exists
[Sat Aug 15 00:09:18 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd2_acisf15129_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src2.csv
[Sat Aug 15 00:09:18 2015] fullrun_ccd2_acisf15129_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src2_1.ximg exists
[Sat Aug 15 00:09:18 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd2_acisf15129_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src2.csv
[Sat Aug 15 00:09:18 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd2_acisf15129_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src2_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd2_acisf15129_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src2.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Aug 15 00:09:18 2015] fullrun_ccd2_acisf15129_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2.ximg exists
[Sat Aug 15 00:09:18 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd2_acisf15129_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2.csv
[Sat Aug 15 00:09:18 2015] fullrun_ccd2_acisf15129_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2_1.ximg exists
[Sat Aug 15 00:09:18 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd2_acisf15129_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2.csv
[Sat Aug 15 00:09:18 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd2_acisf15129_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd2_acisf15129_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Aug 15 00:12:41 2015] Spatial fit model total counts = 46.286000, observed total counts = 54.000000
[Sat Aug 15 00:12:41 2015] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 2
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sat Aug 15 00:12:41 2015] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Aug 15 00:12:41 2015] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Aug 15 00:12:41 2015] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Aug 15 00:12:41 2015] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Aug 15 00:12:41 2015] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 2.13
[Sat Aug 15 00:12:41 2015] Source is asymmetric