[Fri Aug 14 00:17:59 2015] Detection parameters:
  Position = (946.4, 568.0) = 19 34 5.26 -50 59 29.5
  Extent = 0.8" x 0.5", rotation angle = 122 degrees
  Source counts = 10.2 +/- 3.3
  Background counts = 0.8
  Rate = 0.0004 +/- 0.0001

[Fri Aug 14 00:18:00 2015] Off-axis axis estimate = 10.99'
[Fri Aug 14 00:18:35 2015] Using EEF radius (= 5.37 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Aug 14 00:18:35 2015] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass
[Fri Aug 14 00:18:35 2015] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 5.37"
[Fri Aug 14 00:18:35 2015] source mask rpix=10.9, npix_max = 521, mask sum = 476, frac = 0.912
[Fri Aug 14 00:18:35 2015] Giving source the simple spatial ID 5 for pass 0, mean size = 5.37"
[Fri Aug 14 00:18:36 2015] fullrun_ccd1_acisf15120_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src5.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 14 00:18:36 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd1_acisf15120_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src5.csv
[Fri Aug 14 00:18:36 2015] fullrun_ccd1_acisf15120_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src5_1.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 14 00:18:36 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd1_acisf15120_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src5.csv
[Fri Aug 14 00:18:36 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd1_acisf15120_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src5_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd1_acisf15120_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Aug 14 00:18:36 2015] fullrun_ccd1_acisf15120_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 14 00:18:36 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd1_acisf15120_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.csv
[Fri Aug 14 00:18:36 2015] fullrun_ccd1_acisf15120_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 14 00:18:36 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd1_acisf15120_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.csv
[Fri Aug 14 00:18:36 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd1_acisf15120_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd1_acisf15120_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Aug 14 00:18:39 2015] Warning: source 5 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 4 at 61.350099 pixels away
[Fri Aug 14 00:18:39 2015] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Aug 14 00:18:39 2015] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Aug 14 00:18:39 2015] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Aug 14 00:18:39 2015] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Aug 14 00:18:39 2015] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.59
[Fri Aug 14 00:18:39 2015] Source is asymmetric
[Fri Aug 14 00:18:53 2015] Using EEF radius (= 5.37 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Aug 14 00:18:53 2015] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass
[Fri Aug 14 00:18:53 2015] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 5.37"
[Fri Aug 14 00:18:53 2015] source mask rpix=10.9, npix_max = 521, mask sum = 476, frac = 0.912
[Fri Aug 14 00:18:53 2015] Giving source the simple spatial ID 5 for pass 1, mean size = 5.37"
[Fri Aug 14 00:18:53 2015] fullrun_ccd1_acisf15120_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src5.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 14 00:18:53 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd1_acisf15120_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src5.csv
[Fri Aug 14 00:18:53 2015] fullrun_ccd1_acisf15120_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src5_1.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 14 00:18:53 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd1_acisf15120_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src5.csv
[Fri Aug 14 00:18:53 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd1_acisf15120_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src5_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd1_acisf15120_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Aug 14 00:18:53 2015] fullrun_ccd1_acisf15120_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 14 00:18:53 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd1_acisf15120_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.csv
[Fri Aug 14 00:18:53 2015] fullrun_ccd1_acisf15120_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 14 00:18:53 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd1_acisf15120_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.csv
[Fri Aug 14 00:18:53 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd1_acisf15120_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd1_acisf15120_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Aug 14 00:18:59 2015] Warning: source 5 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 4 at 61.350099 pixels away
[Fri Aug 14 00:18:59 2015] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Aug 14 00:18:59 2015] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Aug 14 00:18:59 2015] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Aug 14 00:18:59 2015] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Aug 14 00:18:59 2015] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.59
[Fri Aug 14 00:18:59 2015] Source is asymmetric