[Thu May 28 23:55:46 2015] Detection parameters:
  Position = (1038.9, 754.0) = 0 42 34.13 41 21 50.4
  Extent = 0.8" x 0.5", rotation angle = 164 degrees
  Source counts = 10.8 +/- 3.3
  Background counts = 0.2
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0008

[Thu May 28 23:55:47 2015] Off-axis axis estimate = 6.45'
[Fri May 29 00:35:37 2015] Using EEF radius (= 1.86 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri May 29 00:35:37 2015] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 1.86"
[Fri May 29 00:35:37 2015] source mask rpix=3.8, npix_max = 73, mask sum = 64, frac = 0.871
[Fri May 29 00:35:37 2015] Giving source the simple spatial ID 30 for pass 0, mean size = 1.86"
[Fri May 29 00:56:46 2015] fullrun_ccd3_acisf14929_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src30.ximg exists
[Fri May 29 00:56:46 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf14929_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src30.csv
[Fri May 29 00:56:46 2015] fullrun_ccd3_acisf14929_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src30_1.ximg exists
[Fri May 29 00:56:46 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf14929_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src30.csv
[Fri May 29 00:56:46 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd3_acisf14929_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src30_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd3_acisf14929_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src30.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri May 29 00:56:47 2015] fullrun_ccd3_acisf14929_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src30.ximg exists
[Fri May 29 00:56:47 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf14929_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src30.csv
[Fri May 29 00:56:47 2015] fullrun_ccd3_acisf14929_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src30_1.ximg exists
[Fri May 29 00:56:47 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf14929_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src30.csv
[Fri May 29 00:56:47 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd3_acisf14929_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src30_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd3_acisf14929_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src30.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri May 29 00:56:59 2015] Spatial fit model total counts = 9.571630, observed total counts = 13.000000
[Fri May 29 00:56:59 2015] Offset between fit and detection position for source 34 = 0.651578 pixels
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 34 = 0.651578 pixels
  Position = (1038.9, 754.6) = 0 42 34.17 41 21 50.5
  Extent = 0.7 (0.5-1.0)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 9.8 +/- 3.1
  Background counts = 0.0
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0008
[Fri May 29 00:56:59 2015] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri May 29 00:56:59 2015] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri May 29 00:56:59 2015] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Fri May 29 00:56:59 2015] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri May 29 00:56:59 2015] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri May 29 01:29:36 2015] Using previous fit value to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri May 29 01:29:36 2015] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.74"
[Fri May 29 01:29:36 2015] Spatial fitting skipped for pass 1: source                                 has 9.8 net counts, is at off-axis angle 6.4'
[Fri May 29 01:49:41 2015] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri May 29 01:49:41 2015] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri May 29 01:49:41 2015] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Fri May 29 01:49:41 2015] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri May 29 01:49:41 2015] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00