[Thu May 28 23:55:04 2015] Detection parameters:
  Position = (1182.0, 890.5) = 0 42 52.51 41 15 40.2
  Extent = 0.5" x 0.5", rotation angle = 171 degrees
  Source counts = 22.7 +/- 4.8
  Background counts = 0.3
  Rate = 0.006 +/- 0.001

[Thu May 28 23:55:04 2015] Off-axis axis estimate = 1.17'
[Fri May 29 00:27:15 2015] Using EEF radius (= 0.38 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri May 29 00:27:15 2015] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.38"
[Fri May 29 00:27:15 2015] source mask rpix=0.8, npix_max = 6, mask sum = 5, frac = 0.768
[Fri May 29 00:27:15 2015] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 0, mean size = 0.38"
[Fri May 29 00:35:36 2015] fullrun_ccd2_acisf14929_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src9.ximg exists
[Fri May 29 00:35:36 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd2_acisf14929_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Fri May 29 00:35:36 2015] fullrun_ccd2_acisf14929_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg exists
[Fri May 29 00:35:36 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd2_acisf14929_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Fri May 29 00:35:36 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd2_acisf14929_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd2_acisf14929_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri May 29 00:35:36 2015] fullrun_ccd2_acisf14929_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Fri May 29 00:35:36 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd2_acisf14929_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Fri May 29 00:35:36 2015] fullrun_ccd2_acisf14929_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Fri May 29 00:35:36 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd2_acisf14929_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Fri May 29 00:35:36 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd2_acisf14929_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd2_acisf14929_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri May 29 00:56:55 2015] Spatial fit model total counts = 22.124300, observed total counts = 26.000000
[Fri May 29 00:56:55 2015] Offset between fit and detection position for source 12 = 0.672264 pixels
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 12 = 0.672264 pixels
  Position = (1182.1, 891.1) = 0 42 52.53 41 15 40.3
  Extent = 0.7 (0.5-0.9)" x 0.3 (0.3-0.4)", rotation angle = 349 (331-6) degrees
  Source counts = 30.3 +/- 5.5
  Background counts = 0.0
  Rate = 0.008 +/- 0.001
[Fri May 29 00:56:55 2015] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri May 29 00:56:55 2015] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri May 29 00:56:55 2015] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Fri May 29 00:56:55 2015] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri May 29 00:56:55 2015] Computing asymmetry using errors on major and minor axis (from spatial fitting), asym = 1.21
[Fri May 29 01:20:29 2015] Using previous fit value to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri May 29 01:20:29 2015] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.51"
[Fri May 29 01:20:29 2015] source mask rpix=1.0, npix_max = 9, mask sum = 6, frac = 0.634
[Fri May 29 01:20:29 2015] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 1, mean size = 0.51"
[Fri May 29 01:29:36 2015] fullrun_ccd2_acisf14929_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src9.ximg exists
[Fri May 29 01:29:36 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd2_acisf14929_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src9.csv
[Fri May 29 01:29:36 2015] fullrun_ccd2_acisf14929_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg exists
[Fri May 29 01:29:36 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd2_acisf14929_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src9.csv
[Fri May 29 01:29:36 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd2_acisf14929_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd2_acisf14929_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri May 29 01:29:36 2015] fullrun_ccd2_acisf14929_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Fri May 29 01:29:36 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd2_acisf14929_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Fri May 29 01:29:36 2015] fullrun_ccd2_acisf14929_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Fri May 29 01:29:36 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd2_acisf14929_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Fri May 29 01:29:36 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd2_acisf14929_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd2_acisf14929_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri May 29 01:49:37 2015] Spatial fit model total counts = 23.645100, observed total counts = 26.000000
[Fri May 29 01:49:37 2015] Offset between fit and detection position for source 12 = 0.056045 pixels
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 12 = 0.056045 pixels
  Position = (1182.2, 891.1) = 0 42 52.53 41 15 40.3
  Extent = 0.7 (0.5-0.8)" x 0.3 (0.3-0.4)", rotation angle = 350 (332-4) degrees
  Source counts = 32.0 +/- 5.7
  Background counts = 0.0
  Rate = 0.008 +/- 0.001
[Fri May 29 01:49:37 2015] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri May 29 01:49:37 2015] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri May 29 01:49:37 2015] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Fri May 29 01:49:37 2015] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri May 29 01:49:37 2015] Computing asymmetry using errors on major and minor axis (from spatial fitting), asym = 1.24