[Mon May 11 15:30:09 2015] Detection parameters:
  Position = (665.1, 355.9) = 6 16 17.98 -21 22 4.8
  Extent = 0.6" x 0.5", rotation angle = 163 degrees
  Source counts = 12.1 +/- 3.6
  Background counts = 0.9
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0004

[Mon May 11 15:30:09 2015] Off-axis axis estimate = 0.63'
[Mon May 11 15:45:02 2015] Using EEF radius (= 0.39 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon May 11 15:45:02 2015] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.39"
[Mon May 11 15:45:02 2015] source mask rpix=0.8, npix_max = 6, mask sum = 4, frac = 0.604
[Mon May 11 15:45:02 2015] Giving source the simple spatial ID 13 for pass 0, mean size = 0.39"
[Mon May 11 15:55:57 2015] fullrun_ccd7_acisf14799_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src13.ximg exists
[Mon May 11 15:55:57 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf14799_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src13.csv
[Mon May 11 15:55:57 2015] fullrun_ccd7_acisf14799_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src13_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 11 15:55:57 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf14799_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src13.csv
[Mon May 11 15:55:57 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd7_acisf14799_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src13_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd7_acisf14799_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src13.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 11 15:55:57 2015] fullrun_ccd7_acisf14799_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13.ximg exists
[Mon May 11 15:55:57 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf14799_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13.csv
[Mon May 11 15:55:57 2015] fullrun_ccd7_acisf14799_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 11 15:55:57 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf14799_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13.csv
[Mon May 11 15:55:57 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd7_acisf14799_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd7_acisf14799_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 11 15:56:01 2015] Spatial fit model total counts = 17.247300, observed total counts = 24.000000
[Mon May 11 15:56:01 2015] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 14
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Mon May 11 15:56:01 2015] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon May 11 15:56:01 2015] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon May 11 15:56:01 2015] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon May 11 15:56:01 2015] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon May 11 15:56:01 2015] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.19
[Mon May 11 16:09:24 2015] Using EEF radius (= 0.39 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon May 11 16:09:24 2015] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.39"
[Mon May 11 16:09:24 2015] source mask rpix=0.8, npix_max = 6, mask sum = 4, frac = 0.604
[Mon May 11 16:09:24 2015] Giving source the simple spatial ID 13 for pass 1, mean size = 0.39"
[Mon May 11 16:19:13 2015] fullrun_ccd7_acisf14799_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src13.ximg exists
[Mon May 11 16:19:13 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf14799_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src13.csv
[Mon May 11 16:19:13 2015] fullrun_ccd7_acisf14799_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src13_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 11 16:19:13 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf14799_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src13.csv
[Mon May 11 16:19:13 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd7_acisf14799_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src13_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd7_acisf14799_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src13.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 11 16:19:13 2015] fullrun_ccd7_acisf14799_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13.ximg exists
[Mon May 11 16:19:13 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf14799_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13.csv
[Mon May 11 16:19:13 2015] fullrun_ccd7_acisf14799_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 11 16:19:13 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf14799_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13.csv
[Mon May 11 16:19:13 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd7_acisf14799_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd7_acisf14799_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 11 16:19:17 2015] Spatial fit model total counts = 17.247300, observed total counts = 24.000000
[Mon May 11 16:19:17 2015] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 14
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Mon May 11 16:19:17 2015] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon May 11 16:19:17 2015] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon May 11 16:19:17 2015] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon May 11 16:19:17 2015] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon May 11 16:19:17 2015] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.19