[Wed May 22 09:31:20 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (514.6, 973.0) = 13 47 31.10 -11 43 6.5
  Extent = 0.5" x 0.5", rotation angle = 156 degrees
  Source counts = 10.4 +/- 3.5
  Background counts = 1.6
  Rate = 0.0002 +/- 5e-05

[Wed May 22 09:31:21 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 1.50'
[Wed May 22 10:52:15 2013] Using EEF radius (= 0.39 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed May 22 10:52:15 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.39"
[Wed May 22 10:52:15 2013] source mask rpix=0.8, npix_max = 6, mask sum = 6, frac = 0.890
[Wed May 22 10:52:15 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 17 for pass 0, mean size = 0.39"
[Wed May 22 11:20:16 2013] fullrun_ccd3_acisf14407_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src17.ximg exists
[Wed May 22 11:20:16 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf14407_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src17.csv
[Wed May 22 11:20:16 2013] fullrun_ccd3_acisf14407_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src17_1.ximg exists
[Wed May 22 11:20:16 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf14407_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src17.csv
[Wed May 22 11:20:16 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd3_acisf14407_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src17_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd3_acisf14407_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src17.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed May 22 11:20:16 2013] fullrun_ccd3_acisf14407_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17.ximg exists
[Wed May 22 11:20:16 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf14407_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17.csv
[Wed May 22 11:20:16 2013] fullrun_ccd3_acisf14407_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17_1.ximg exists
[Wed May 22 11:20:16 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf14407_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17.csv
[Wed May 22 11:20:16 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd3_acisf14407_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd3_acisf14407_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed May 22 12:34:02 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 14.471900, observed total counts = 20.000000
[Wed May 22 12:34:02 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 16
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Wed May 22 12:34:02 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed May 22 12:34:02 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed May 22 12:34:02 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed May 22 12:34:02 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed May 22 12:34:02 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed May 22 12:34:02 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.7