[Wed May 22 09:31:20 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (172.6, 930.0) = 13 47 42.55 -11 43 27.7
  Extent = 0.5" x 0.5", rotation angle = 90 degrees
  Source counts = 14.1 +/- 3.9
  Background counts = 0.9
  Rate = 0.0002 +/- 6e-05

[Wed May 22 09:31:21 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.06'
[Wed May 22 10:52:15 2013] Using EEF radius (= 0.44 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed May 22 10:52:15 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.44"
[Wed May 22 10:52:15 2013] source mask rpix=0.9, npix_max = 7, mask sum = 6, frac = 0.779
[Wed May 22 10:52:15 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 15 for pass 0, mean size = 0.44"
[Wed May 22 11:20:16 2013] fullrun_ccd3_acisf14407_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src15.ximg exists
[Wed May 22 11:20:16 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf14407_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src15.csv
[Wed May 22 11:20:16 2013] fullrun_ccd3_acisf14407_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src15_1.ximg exists
[Wed May 22 11:20:16 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf14407_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src15.csv
[Wed May 22 11:20:16 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd3_acisf14407_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src15_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd3_acisf14407_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src15.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed May 22 11:20:16 2013] fullrun_ccd3_acisf14407_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src15.ximg exists
[Wed May 22 11:20:16 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf14407_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src15.csv
[Wed May 22 11:20:16 2013] fullrun_ccd3_acisf14407_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src15_1.ximg exists
[Wed May 22 11:20:16 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf14407_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src15.csv
[Wed May 22 11:20:16 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd3_acisf14407_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src15_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd3_acisf14407_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src15.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed May 22 12:34:02 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 14.697800, observed total counts = 18.000000
[Wed May 22 12:34:02 2013] Offset between fit and detection position for source 15 = 0.573994 pixels
[Wed May 22 12:34:02 2013] 15.206660 total counts/ 2.480760 bgd. counts: snr = 8.079717
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 15 = 0.573994 pixels
  Position = (172.6, 930.5) = 13 47 42.57 -11 43 27.7
  Extent = 0.4 (0.3-0.5)" x 0.2 (0.1-0.3)", rotation angle = 90 (64-107) degrees
  Source counts = 12.7 +/- 3.9
  Background counts = 2.5
  Rate = 0.0002 +/- 6e-05
[Wed May 22 12:34:02 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed May 22 12:34:02 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed May 22 12:34:02 2013] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Wed May 22 12:34:02 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed May 22 12:34:02 2013] Computing asymmetry using errors on major and minor axis (from spatial fitting), asym = 0.78
[Wed May 22 12:34:02 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.7