[Fri Aug 14 00:15:27 2015] Detection parameters:
  Position = (440.5, 841.5) = 6 37 56.02 47 48 11.6
  Extent = 0.5" x 0.5", rotation angle = 90 degrees
  Source counts = 81.3 +/- 9.2
  Background counts = 3.7
  Rate = 0.008 +/- 0.0009

[Fri Aug 14 00:15:28 2015] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.50'
[Fri Aug 14 00:15:54 2015] Using EEF radius (= 0.49 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Aug 14 00:15:54 2015] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.49"
[Fri Aug 14 00:15:54 2015] source mask rpix=1.0, npix_max = 9, mask sum = 9, frac = 1.000
[Fri Aug 14 00:15:54 2015] Giving source the simple spatial ID 1 for pass 0, mean size = 0.49"
[Fri Aug 14 00:15:54 2015] fullrun_ccd3_acisf14388_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src1.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 14 00:15:54 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf14388_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src1.csv
[Fri Aug 14 00:15:54 2015] fullrun_ccd3_acisf14388_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src1_1.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 14 00:15:54 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf14388_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src1.csv
[Fri Aug 14 00:15:54 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd3_acisf14388_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src1_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd3_acisf14388_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src1.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Aug 14 00:15:54 2015] fullrun_ccd3_acisf14388_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src1.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 14 00:15:54 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf14388_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src1.csv
[Fri Aug 14 00:15:54 2015] fullrun_ccd3_acisf14388_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src1_1.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 14 00:15:54 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf14388_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src1.csv
[Fri Aug 14 00:15:54 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd3_acisf14388_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src1_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd3_acisf14388_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src1.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Aug 14 00:15:58 2015] Spatial fit model total counts = 93.423100, observed total counts = 181.000000
[Fri Aug 14 00:15:58 2015] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 2
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Fri Aug 14 00:15:58 2015] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Aug 14 00:15:58 2015] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Aug 14 00:15:58 2015] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Aug 14 00:15:58 2015] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Aug 14 00:15:58 2015] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Aug 14 00:16:09 2015] Using EEF radius (= 0.49 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Aug 14 00:16:09 2015] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.49"
[Fri Aug 14 00:16:09 2015] source mask rpix=1.0, npix_max = 9, mask sum = 9, frac = 1.000
[Fri Aug 14 00:16:09 2015] Giving source the simple spatial ID 1 for pass 1, mean size = 0.49"
[Fri Aug 14 00:16:10 2015] fullrun_ccd3_acisf14388_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src1.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 14 00:16:10 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf14388_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src1.csv
[Fri Aug 14 00:16:10 2015] fullrun_ccd3_acisf14388_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src1_1.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 14 00:16:10 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf14388_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src1.csv
[Fri Aug 14 00:16:10 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd3_acisf14388_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src1_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd3_acisf14388_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src1.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Aug 14 00:16:10 2015] fullrun_ccd3_acisf14388_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src1.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 14 00:16:10 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf14388_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src1.csv
[Fri Aug 14 00:16:10 2015] fullrun_ccd3_acisf14388_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src1_1.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 14 00:16:10 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf14388_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src1.csv
[Fri Aug 14 00:16:10 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd3_acisf14388_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src1_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd3_acisf14388_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src1.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Aug 14 00:16:13 2015] Spatial fit model total counts = 93.423100, observed total counts = 181.000000
[Fri Aug 14 00:16:13 2015] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 2
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Fri Aug 14 00:16:13 2015] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Aug 14 00:16:13 2015] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Aug 14 00:16:13 2015] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Aug 14 00:16:13 2015] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Aug 14 00:16:13 2015] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00