[Mon May 27 15:57:34 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (533.8, 320.8) = 1 3 8.86 -49 18 12.0
  Extent = 0.9" x 0.5", rotation angle = 98 degrees
  Source counts = 11.0 +/- 3.6
  Background counts = 2.0
  Rate = 0.0001 +/- 3e-05

[Mon May 27 15:57:34 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 4.46'
[Mon May 27 17:42:42 2013] Using EEF radius (= 0.98 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon May 27 17:42:42 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.98"
[Mon May 27 17:42:42 2013] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 24, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.008
[Mon May 27 17:42:42 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 29 for pass 0, mean size = 0.98"
[Mon May 27 18:13:20 2013] fullrun_ccd3_acisf14023_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src29.ximg exists
[Mon May 27 18:13:20 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf14023_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src29.csv
[Mon May 27 18:13:20 2013] fullrun_ccd3_acisf14023_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src29_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 27 18:13:20 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf14023_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src29.csv
[Mon May 27 18:13:20 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd3_acisf14023_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src29_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd3_acisf14023_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src29.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 27 18:13:20 2013] fullrun_ccd3_acisf14023_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src29.ximg exists
[Mon May 27 18:13:20 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf14023_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src29.csv
[Mon May 27 18:13:20 2013] fullrun_ccd3_acisf14023_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src29_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 27 18:13:20 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf14023_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src29.csv
[Mon May 27 18:13:20 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd3_acisf14023_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src29_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd3_acisf14023_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src29.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 27 18:27:08 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 13.818900, observed total counts = 16.000000
[Mon May 27 18:27:08 2013] Offset between fit and detection position for source 28 = 1.123337 pixels
[Mon May 27 18:27:08 2013] 13.326030 total counts/ 2.994830 bgd. counts: snr = 5.969867
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 28 = 1.123337 pixels
  Position = (534.0, 321.9) = 1 3 8.88 -49 18 11.7
  Extent = 1.0 (0.7-2.0)" x 0.3 (0.2-0.5)", rotation angle = 71 (55-83) degrees
  Source counts = 10.3 +/- 3.7
  Background counts = 3.0
  Rate = 9e-05 +/- 3e-05
[Mon May 27 18:27:08 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon May 27 18:27:08 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon May 27 18:27:08 2013] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Mon May 27 18:27:08 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon May 27 18:27:08 2013] Computing asymmetry using errors on major and minor axis (from spatial fitting), asym = 1.35
[Mon May 27 18:27:08 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9