[Sun May 5 06:26:45 2013] Detection parameters: Position = (201.4, 355.3) = 8 41 46.99 1 1 59.8 Extent = 0.8" x 0.5", rotation angle = 77 degrees Source counts = 12.0 +/- 3.6 Background counts = 1.0 Rate = 0.0006 +/- 0.0002 [Sun May 5 06:26:46 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.80' [Sun May 5 07:23:07 2013] Using EEF radius (= 0.54 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sun May 5 07:23:07 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.54" [Sun May 5 07:23:07 2013] source mask rpix=1.1, npix_max = 10, mask sum = 9, frac = 0.876 [Sun May 5 07:23:07 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 12 for pass 0, mean size = 0.54" [Sun May 5 07:37:52 2013] fullrun_ccd7_acisf13950_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src12.ximg exists [Sun May 5 07:37:52 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf13950_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src12.csv [Sun May 5 07:37:52 2013] fullrun_ccd7_acisf13950_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src12_1.ximg exists [Sun May 5 07:37:52 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf13950_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src12.csv [Sun May 5 07:37:52 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_ccd7_acisf13950_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src12_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd7_acisf13950_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src12.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sun May 5 07:37:52 2013] fullrun_ccd7_acisf13950_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12.ximg exists [Sun May 5 07:37:52 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf13950_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12.csv [Sun May 5 07:37:52 2013] fullrun_ccd7_acisf13950_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12_1.ximg exists [Sun May 5 07:37:52 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf13950_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12.csv [Sun May 5 07:37:52 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_ccd7_acisf13950_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd7_acisf13950_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sun May 5 07:37:58 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 10.557900, observed total counts = 14.000000 [Sun May 5 07:37:58 2013] Offset between fit and detection position for source 4 = 0.463730 pixels Spatial fit parameters: Offset between fit and detection position for source 4 = 0.463730 pixels Position = (201.9, 355.3) = 8 41 46.99 1 1 59.6 Extent = 0.8 (0.6-1.4)" x 0.3 (0.2-0.5)", rotation angle = 118 (101-134) degrees Source counts = 11.7 +/- 3.4 Background counts = 0.0 Rate = 0.0006 +/- 0.0002 [Sun May 5 07:37:58 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Sun May 5 07:37:58 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Sun May 5 07:37:58 2013] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound [Sun May 5 07:37:58 2013] Source does appear to be extended [Sun May 5 07:37:58 2013] Computing asymmetry using errors on major and minor axis (from spatial fitting), asym = 1.28 [Sun May 5 08:28:21 2013] Using previous fit value to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sun May 5 08:28:21 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.56" [Sun May 5 08:28:21 2013] source mask rpix=1.1, npix_max = 10, mask sum = 12, frac = 1.109 [Sun May 5 08:28:21 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 12 for pass 1, mean size = 0.56" [Sun May 5 08:42:25 2013] fullrun_ccd7_acisf13950_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src12.ximg exists [Sun May 5 08:42:25 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf13950_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src12.csv [Sun May 5 08:42:25 2013] fullrun_ccd7_acisf13950_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src12_1.ximg exists [Sun May 5 08:42:25 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf13950_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src12.csv [Sun May 5 08:42:25 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_ccd7_acisf13950_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src12_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd7_acisf13950_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src12.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sun May 5 08:42:25 2013] fullrun_ccd7_acisf13950_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12.ximg exists [Sun May 5 08:42:25 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf13950_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12.csv [Sun May 5 08:42:25 2013] fullrun_ccd7_acisf13950_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12_1.ximg exists [Sun May 5 08:42:25 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf13950_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12.csv [Sun May 5 08:42:25 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_ccd7_acisf13950_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd7_acisf13950_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sun May 5 08:42:30 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 10.881400, observed total counts = 16.000000 [Sun May 5 08:42:30 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 4 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Sun May 5 08:42:30 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Sun May 5 08:42:30 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Sun May 5 08:42:30 2013] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound [Sun May 5 08:42:30 2013] Source does appear to be extended [Sun May 5 08:42:30 2013] Computing asymmetry using errors on major and minor axis (from spatial fitting), asym = 1.28