[Mon Jul 29 11:12:19 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (654.3, 1374.2) = 5 41 12.35 77 13 54.6
  Extent = 0.9" x 0.6", rotation angle = 140 degrees
  Source counts = 11.3 +/- 3.7
  Background counts = 2.7
  Rate = 0.0001 +/- 5e-05

[Mon Jul 29 11:12:19 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 7.16'
[Mon Jul 29 11:13:30 2013] Using EEF radius (= 2.28 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Jul 29 11:13:30 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 2.28"
[Mon Jul 29 11:13:30 2013] source mask rpix=4.6, npix_max = 105, mask sum = 100, frac = 0.951
[Mon Jul 29 11:13:30 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 0, mean size = 2.28"
[Mon Jul 29 11:13:31 2013] fullrun_ccd3_acisf13810_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src9.ximg exists
[Mon Jul 29 11:13:31 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf13810_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Mon Jul 29 11:13:31 2013] fullrun_ccd3_acisf13810_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jul 29 11:13:31 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf13810_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Mon Jul 29 11:13:31 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd3_acisf13810_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd3_acisf13810_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jul 29 11:13:31 2013] fullrun_ccd3_acisf13810_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Mon Jul 29 11:13:31 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf13810_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Mon Jul 29 11:13:31 2013] fullrun_ccd3_acisf13810_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jul 29 11:13:31 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf13810_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Mon Jul 29 11:13:31 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd3_acisf13810_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd3_acisf13810_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jul 29 11:13:43 2013] Warning: source 9 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 5 at 26.963133 pixels away
[Mon Jul 29 11:13:43 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Jul 29 11:13:43 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Jul 29 11:13:43 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Jul 29 11:13:43 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Jul 29 11:13:43 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.51
[Mon Jul 29 11:13:43 2013] Source is asymmetric
[Mon Jul 29 11:14:12 2013] Using EEF radius (= 2.28 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Jul 29 11:14:12 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 2.28"
[Mon Jul 29 11:14:12 2013] source mask rpix=4.6, npix_max = 105, mask sum = 100, frac = 0.951
[Mon Jul 29 11:14:12 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 1, mean size = 2.28"
[Mon Jul 29 11:14:13 2013] fullrun_ccd3_acisf13810_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src9.ximg exists
[Mon Jul 29 11:14:13 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf13810_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src9.csv
[Mon Jul 29 11:14:13 2013] fullrun_ccd3_acisf13810_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jul 29 11:14:13 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf13810_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src9.csv
[Mon Jul 29 11:14:13 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd3_acisf13810_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd3_acisf13810_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jul 29 11:14:13 2013] fullrun_ccd3_acisf13810_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Mon Jul 29 11:14:13 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf13810_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Mon Jul 29 11:14:13 2013] fullrun_ccd3_acisf13810_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jul 29 11:14:13 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf13810_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Mon Jul 29 11:14:13 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd3_acisf13810_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd3_acisf13810_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jul 29 11:14:25 2013] Warning: source 9 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 5 at 26.963133 pixels away
[Mon Jul 29 11:14:25 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Jul 29 11:14:25 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Jul 29 11:14:25 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Jul 29 11:14:25 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Jul 29 11:14:25 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.51
[Mon Jul 29 11:14:25 2013] Source is asymmetric
[Mon Jul 29 11:14:25 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9