[Fri Aug 16 08:43:51 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (461.4, 457.4) = 9 55 31.89 69 39 57.7
  Extent = 0.6" x 0.5", rotation angle = 109 degrees
  Source counts = 15.9 +/- 4.1
  Background counts = 1.1
  Rate = 0.0008 +/- 0.0002

[Fri Aug 16 08:43:51 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 1.61'
[Fri Aug 16 09:40:22 2013] Using EEF radius (= 0.40 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Aug 16 09:40:22 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.40"
[Fri Aug 16 09:40:22 2013] source mask rpix=0.8, npix_max = 6, mask sum = 9, frac = 1.310
[Fri Aug 16 09:40:22 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 51 for pass 0, mean size = 0.40"
[Fri Aug 16 10:47:02 2013] fullrun_ccd7_acisf13796_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src51.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 16 10:47:02 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf13796_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src51.csv
[Fri Aug 16 10:47:02 2013] fullrun_ccd7_acisf13796_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src51_1.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 16 10:47:02 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf13796_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src51.csv
[Fri Aug 16 10:47:02 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd7_acisf13796_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src51_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd7_acisf13796_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src51.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Aug 16 10:47:03 2013] fullrun_ccd7_acisf13796_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src51.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 16 10:47:03 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf13796_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src51.csv
[Fri Aug 16 10:47:03 2013] fullrun_ccd7_acisf13796_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src51_1.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 16 10:47:03 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf13796_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src51.csv
[Fri Aug 16 10:47:03 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd7_acisf13796_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src51_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd7_acisf13796_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src51.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Aug 16 10:47:15 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 16.951900, observed total counts = 20.000000
[Fri Aug 16 10:47:15 2013] Offset between fit and detection position for source 50 = 0.494674 pixels
[Fri Aug 16 10:47:15 2013] 18.360080 total counts/ 3.586380 bgd. counts: snr = 7.801195
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 50 = 0.494674 pixels
  Position = (461.7, 457.8) = 9 55 31.91 69 39 57.7
  Extent = 0.4 (0.3-0.7)" x 0.3 (0.2-0.4)", rotation angle = 64 (36-141) degrees
  Source counts = 14.8 +/- 4.3
  Background counts = 3.6
  Rate = 0.0007 +/- 0.0002
[Fri Aug 16 10:47:15 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Aug 16 10:47:15 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Aug 16 10:47:15 2013] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Fri Aug 16 10:47:15 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Aug 16 10:47:15 2013] Computing asymmetry using errors on major and minor axis (from spatial fitting), asym = 0.82
[Fri Aug 16 10:47:15 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.8