[Fri Aug 16 08:43:51 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (433.0, 266.4) = 9 55 34.59 69 38 23.8
  Extent = 0.5" x 0.5", rotation angle = 83 degrees
  Source counts = 12.4 +/- 3.6
  Background counts = 0.6
  Rate = 0.0006 +/- 0.0002

[Fri Aug 16 08:43:51 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.64'
[Fri Aug 16 09:40:22 2013] Using EEF radius (= 0.52 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Aug 16 09:40:22 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.52"
[Fri Aug 16 09:40:22 2013] source mask rpix=1.0, npix_max = 9, mask sum = 12, frac = 1.253
[Fri Aug 16 09:40:22 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 56 for pass 0, mean size = 0.52"
[Fri Aug 16 10:47:02 2013] fullrun_ccd7_acisf13796_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src56.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 16 10:47:02 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf13796_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src56.csv
[Fri Aug 16 10:47:02 2013] fullrun_ccd7_acisf13796_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src56_1.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 16 10:47:02 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf13796_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src56.csv
[Fri Aug 16 10:47:02 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd7_acisf13796_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src56_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd7_acisf13796_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src56.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Aug 16 10:47:03 2013] fullrun_ccd7_acisf13796_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src56.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 16 10:47:03 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf13796_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src56.csv
[Fri Aug 16 10:47:03 2013] fullrun_ccd7_acisf13796_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src56_1.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 16 10:47:03 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf13796_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src56.csv
[Fri Aug 16 10:47:03 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd7_acisf13796_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src56_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd7_acisf13796_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src56.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Aug 16 10:47:15 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 15.478700, observed total counts = 18.000000
[Fri Aug 16 10:47:15 2013] Offset between fit and detection position for source 48 = 0.586488 pixels
[Fri Aug 16 10:47:15 2013] 15.641030 total counts/ 2.681830 bgd. counts: snr = 7.913390
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 48 = 0.586488 pixels
  Position = (433.5, 266.7) = 9 55 34.59 69 38 23.7
  Extent = 0.6 (0.5-1.1)" x 0.2 (0.2-0.2)", rotation angle = 90 (79-105) degrees
  Source counts = 13.0 +/- 4.0
  Background counts = 2.7
  Rate = 0.0007 +/- 0.0002
[Fri Aug 16 10:47:15 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Aug 16 10:47:15 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Aug 16 10:47:15 2013] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Fri Aug 16 10:47:15 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Aug 16 10:47:15 2013] Computing asymmetry using errors on major and minor axis (from spatial fitting), asym = 2.25
[Fri Aug 16 10:47:15 2013] Source is asymmetric
[Fri Aug 16 10:47:15 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.7