[Sat Aug 4 17:55:24 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (287.0, 322.3) = 15 4 4.51 -41 48 39.4 Extent = 3.8" x 0.5", rotation angle = 158 degrees Source counts = 11.6 +/- 9.2 Background counts = 72.4 Rate = 0.0001 +/- 0.0001 [Sat Aug 4 17:55:24 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 10.56' [Sat Aug 4 18:06:06 2012] Using EEF radius (= 4.95 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sat Aug 4 18:06:06 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 4.95" [Sat Aug 4 18:06:06 2012] source mask rpix=10.1, npix_max = 445, mask sum = 301, frac = 0.675 [Sat Aug 4 18:06:06 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 65 for pass 0, mean size = 4.95" [Sat Aug 4 22:48:17 2012] fullrun_ccd0_acisf13743_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src65.ximg exists [Sat Aug 4 22:48:17 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd0_acisf13743_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src65.csv [Sat Aug 4 22:48:17 2012] fullrun_ccd0_acisf13743_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src65_1.ximg exists [Sat Aug 4 22:48:17 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd0_acisf13743_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src65.csv [Sat Aug 4 22:48:17 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_ccd0_acisf13743_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src65_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd0_acisf13743_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src65.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sat Aug 4 22:48:18 2012] fullrun_ccd0_acisf13743_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src65.ximg exists [Sat Aug 4 22:48:18 2012] fullrun_ccd0_acisf13743_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src65_1.ximg exists [Sat Aug 4 22:48:18 2012] Fit fullrun_ccd0_acisf13743_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src65 appears to have run properly [Sun Aug 5 00:51:39 2012] Warning, spatial fit 65 centroid is now closest to src. 28 [Sun Aug 5 00:51:39 2012] Warning: source 66 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 101 at 17.244194 pixels away [Sun Aug 5 00:51:39 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Sun Aug 5 00:51:39 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Sun Aug 5 00:51:39 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Sun Aug 5 00:51:39 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Sun Aug 5 00:51:39 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 7.26 [Sun Aug 5 00:51:39 2012] Source is asymmetric [Sun Aug 5 00:51:39 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.7