[Thu May  9 06:11:16 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (408.1, 1088.7) = 15 2 39.87 -41 53 23.8
  Extent = 0.5" x 0.5", rotation angle = 122 degrees
  Source counts = 13.2 +/- 4.0
  Background counts = 2.8
  Rate = 0.0003 +/- 8e-05

[Thu May  9 06:11:16 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.73'
[Thu May  9 06:16:09 2013] Using EEF radius (= 0.53 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu May  9 06:16:09 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.53"
[Thu May  9 06:16:09 2013] source mask rpix=1.1, npix_max = 9, mask sum = 9, frac = 0.904
[Thu May  9 06:16:09 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 0, mean size = 0.53"
[Thu May  9 06:43:34 2013] fullrun_ccd0_acisf13740_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src9.ximg exists
[Thu May  9 06:43:34 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd0_acisf13740_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Thu May  9 06:43:34 2013] fullrun_ccd0_acisf13740_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg exists
[Thu May  9 06:43:34 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd0_acisf13740_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Thu May  9 06:43:34 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd0_acisf13740_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd0_acisf13740_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu May  9 06:43:34 2013] fullrun_ccd0_acisf13740_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Thu May  9 06:43:34 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd0_acisf13740_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Thu May  9 06:43:34 2013] fullrun_ccd0_acisf13740_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Thu May  9 06:43:34 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd0_acisf13740_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Thu May  9 06:43:34 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd0_acisf13740_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd0_acisf13740_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu May  9 07:46:32 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 16.185900, observed total counts = 20.000000
[Thu May  9 07:46:32 2013] Offset between fit and detection position for source 10 = 0.849337 pixels
[Thu May  9 07:46:32 2013] 18.255030 total counts/ 8.971060 bgd. counts: snr = 3.099644
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 10 = 0.849337 pixels
  Position = (408.6, 1089.4) = 15 2 39.87 -41 53 23.7
  Extent = 0.5 (0.4-1.0)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 9.3 +/- 4.3
  Background counts = 9.0
  Rate = 0.0002 +/- 8e-05
[Thu May  9 07:46:32 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu May  9 07:46:32 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu May  9 07:46:32 2013] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Thu May  9 07:46:32 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu May  9 07:46:32 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu May  9 07:46:32 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9