[Tue May 14 22:01:45 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (1108.6, 676.2) = 15 2 19.75 -42 10 16.7
  Extent = 0.5" x 0.5", rotation angle = 44 degrees
  Source counts = 10.3 +/- 3.5
  Background counts = 1.7
  Rate = 0.0001 +/- 3e-05

[Tue May 14 22:01:46 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 3.59'
[Tue May 14 22:13:53 2013] Using EEF radius (= 0.72 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue May 14 22:13:53 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.72"
[Tue May 14 22:13:53 2013] source mask rpix=1.5, npix_max = 15, mask sum = 16, frac = 1.048
[Tue May 14 22:13:53 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 7 for pass 0, mean size = 0.72"
[Tue May 14 23:39:21 2013] fullrun_ccd0_acisf13739_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src7.ximg exists
[Tue May 14 23:39:21 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd0_acisf13739_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src7.csv
[Tue May 14 23:39:21 2013] fullrun_ccd0_acisf13739_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src7_1.ximg exists
[Tue May 14 23:39:21 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd0_acisf13739_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src7.csv
[Tue May 14 23:39:21 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd0_acisf13739_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src7_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd0_acisf13739_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src7.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May 14 23:39:22 2013] fullrun_ccd0_acisf13739_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src7.ximg exists
[Tue May 14 23:39:22 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd0_acisf13739_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src7.csv
[Tue May 14 23:39:22 2013] fullrun_ccd0_acisf13739_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src7_1.ximg exists
[Tue May 14 23:39:22 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd0_acisf13739_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src7.csv
[Tue May 14 23:39:22 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd0_acisf13739_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src7_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd0_acisf13739_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src7.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed May 15 03:10:00 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 12.591800, observed total counts = 14.000000
[Wed May 15 03:10:00 2013] Offset between fit and detection position for source 8 = 0.729771 pixels
[Wed May 15 03:10:00 2013] 12.630217 total counts/ 0.623917 bgd. counts: snr = 15.200077
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 8 = 0.729771 pixels
  Position = (1109.1, 676.7) = 15 2 19.75 -42 10 16.7
  Extent = 0.6 (0.4-0.9)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 12.0 +/- 3.6
  Background counts = 0.6
  Rate = 0.0001 +/- 4e-05
[Wed May 15 03:10:00 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed May 15 03:10:00 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed May 15 03:10:00 2013] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Wed May 15 03:10:00 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed May 15 03:10:00 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed May 15 03:10:00 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9