[Fri Aug 10 22:41:40 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (848.6, 704.9) = 15 1 28.37 -42 3 50.2
  Extent = 1.5" x 0.7", rotation angle = 61 degrees
  Source counts = 10.9 +/- 3.7
  Background counts = 3.1
  Rate = 0.0001 +/- 5e-05

[Fri Aug 10 22:41:41 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 6.57'
[Fri Aug 10 23:25:23 2012] Using EEF radius (= 1.93 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Aug 10 23:25:23 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 1.93"
[Fri Aug 10 23:25:23 2012] source mask rpix=3.9, npix_max = 78, mask sum = 72, frac = 0.920
[Fri Aug 10 23:25:23 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 45 for pass 0, mean size = 1.93"
[Sat Aug 11 00:40:12 2012] fullrun_ccd1_acisf13738_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src45.ximg exists
[Sat Aug 11 00:40:12 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd1_acisf13738_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src45.csv
[Sat Aug 11 00:40:12 2012] fullrun_ccd1_acisf13738_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src45_1.ximg exists
[Sat Aug 11 00:40:12 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd1_acisf13738_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src45.csv
[Sat Aug 11 00:40:12 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd1_acisf13738_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src45_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd1_acisf13738_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src45.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Aug 11 00:40:13 2012] fullrun_ccd1_acisf13738_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src45.ximg exists
[Sat Aug 11 00:40:13 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd1_acisf13738_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src45.csv
[Sat Aug 11 00:40:13 2012] fullrun_ccd1_acisf13738_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src45_1.ximg exists
[Sat Aug 11 00:40:13 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd1_acisf13738_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src45.csv
[Sat Aug 11 00:40:13 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd1_acisf13738_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src45_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd1_acisf13738_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src45.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Aug 11 01:46:57 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 13.620300, observed total counts = 17.000000
[Sat Aug 11 01:46:57 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 28 = 1.289964 pixels
[Sat Aug 11 01:46:57 2012] 14.936401 total counts/ 0.000001 bgd. counts: snr = 16087.778619
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 28 = 1.289964 pixels
  Position = (848.1, 703.8) = 15 1 28.41 -42 3 51.0
  Extent = 1.6 (1.2-2.1)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 14.9 +/- 3.9
  Background counts = 0.0
  Rate = 0.0002 +/- 5e-05
[Sat Aug 11 01:46:57 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Aug 11 01:46:57 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Aug 11 01:46:57 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Sat Aug 11 01:46:57 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Aug 11 01:46:57 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Aug 11 01:46:57 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9