[Fri Aug 14 06:20:17 2015] Detection parameters:
  Position = (619.7, 713.6) = 6 25 27.61 -53 59 11.9
  Extent = 1.1" x 0.5", rotation angle = 9 degrees
  Source counts = 27.2 +/- 5.4
  Background counts = 1.8
  Rate = 0.0006 +/- 0.0001

[Fri Aug 14 06:20:18 2015] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.65'
[Fri Aug 14 06:38:30 2015] Using EEF radius (= 1.46 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Aug 14 06:38:30 2015] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 1.46"
[Fri Aug 14 06:38:30 2015] source mask rpix=3.0, npix_max = 48, mask sum = 49, frac = 1.019
[Fri Aug 14 06:38:30 2015] Giving source the simple spatial ID 6 for pass 0, mean size = 1.46"
[Fri Aug 14 06:49:22 2015] fullrun_ccd3_acisf13525_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src6.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 14 06:49:22 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf13525_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src6.csv
[Fri Aug 14 06:49:22 2015] fullrun_ccd3_acisf13525_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src6_1.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 14 06:49:22 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf13525_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src6.csv
[Fri Aug 14 06:49:22 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd3_acisf13525_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src6_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd3_acisf13525_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src6.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Aug 14 06:49:22 2015] fullrun_ccd3_acisf13525_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 14 06:49:22 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf13525_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6.csv
[Fri Aug 14 06:49:22 2015] fullrun_ccd3_acisf13525_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6_1.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 14 06:49:22 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf13525_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6.csv
[Fri Aug 14 06:49:22 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd3_acisf13525_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd3_acisf13525_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Aug 14 06:49:29 2015] Spatial fit model total counts = 38.101000, observed total counts = 47.000000
[Fri Aug 14 06:49:29 2015] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 8
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Fri Aug 14 06:49:29 2015] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Aug 14 06:49:29 2015] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Aug 14 06:49:29 2015] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Aug 14 06:49:29 2015] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Aug 14 06:49:29 2015] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 2.18
[Fri Aug 14 06:49:29 2015] Source is asymmetric
[Fri Aug 14 07:02:46 2015] Using EEF radius (= 1.46 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Aug 14 07:02:46 2015] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 1.46"
[Fri Aug 14 07:02:46 2015] source mask rpix=3.0, npix_max = 48, mask sum = 49, frac = 1.019
[Fri Aug 14 07:02:46 2015] Giving source the simple spatial ID 6 for pass 1, mean size = 1.46"
[Fri Aug 14 07:12:15 2015] fullrun_ccd3_acisf13525_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src6.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 14 07:12:15 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf13525_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src6.csv
[Fri Aug 14 07:12:15 2015] fullrun_ccd3_acisf13525_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src6_1.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 14 07:12:15 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf13525_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src6.csv
[Fri Aug 14 07:12:15 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd3_acisf13525_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src6_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd3_acisf13525_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src6.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Aug 14 07:12:16 2015] fullrun_ccd3_acisf13525_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 14 07:12:16 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf13525_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6.csv
[Fri Aug 14 07:12:16 2015] fullrun_ccd3_acisf13525_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6_1.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 14 07:12:16 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf13525_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6.csv
[Fri Aug 14 07:12:16 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd3_acisf13525_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd3_acisf13525_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Aug 14 07:12:22 2015] Spatial fit model total counts = 38.101000, observed total counts = 47.000000
[Fri Aug 14 07:12:22 2015] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 8
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Fri Aug 14 07:12:22 2015] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Aug 14 07:12:22 2015] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Aug 14 07:12:22 2015] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Aug 14 07:12:22 2015] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Aug 14 07:12:22 2015] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 2.18
[Fri Aug 14 07:12:22 2015] Source is asymmetric