[Fri Aug 14 06:18:53 2015] Detection parameters: Position = (1240.7, 727.4) = 6 25 34.33 -53 52 55.0 Extent = 0.5" x 0.5", rotation angle = 1 degrees Source counts = 16.4 +/- 4.1 Background counts = 0.6 Rate = 0.0003 +/- 9e-05 [Fri Aug 14 06:18:54 2015] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.30' [Fri Aug 14 06:27:15 2015] Using EEF radius (= 0.47 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Fri Aug 14 06:27:15 2015] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.47" [Fri Aug 14 06:27:15 2015] source mask rpix=0.9, npix_max = 8, mask sum = 9, frac = 1.077 [Fri Aug 14 06:27:15 2015] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 0, mean size = 0.47" [Fri Aug 14 06:35:39 2015] fullrun_ccd1_acisf13525_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src9.ximg exists [Fri Aug 14 06:35:39 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd1_acisf13525_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src9.csv [Fri Aug 14 06:35:39 2015] fullrun_ccd1_acisf13525_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg exists [Fri Aug 14 06:35:39 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd1_acisf13525_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src9.csv [Fri Aug 14 06:35:39 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_ccd1_acisf13525_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd1_acisf13525_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Fri Aug 14 06:35:39 2015] fullrun_ccd1_acisf13525_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists [Fri Aug 14 06:35:39 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd1_acisf13525_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.csv [Fri Aug 14 06:35:39 2015] fullrun_ccd1_acisf13525_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists [Fri Aug 14 06:35:39 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd1_acisf13525_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.csv [Fri Aug 14 06:35:39 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_ccd1_acisf13525_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd1_acisf13525_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Fri Aug 14 06:49:27 2015] Spatial fit model total counts = 14.387000, observed total counts = 18.000000 [Fri Aug 14 06:49:27 2015] Offset between fit and detection position for source 8 = 0.671521 pixels Spatial fit parameters: Offset between fit and detection position for source 8 = 0.671521 pixels Position = (1241.1, 727.9) = 6 25 34.33 -53 52 55.1 Extent = 0.6 (0.3-0.7)" x 0.3 (0.2-0.5)", rotation angle = 0 (332-0) degrees Source counts = 15.1 +/- 3.9 Background counts = 0.0 Rate = 0.0003 +/- 8e-05 [Fri Aug 14 06:49:27 2015] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Fri Aug 14 06:49:27 2015] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Fri Aug 14 06:49:27 2015] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound [Fri Aug 14 06:49:27 2015] Source does appear to be extended [Fri Aug 14 06:49:27 2015] Computing asymmetry using errors on major and minor axis (from spatial fitting), asym = 0.69 [Fri Aug 14 06:52:45 2015] Using previous fit value to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Fri Aug 14 06:52:45 2015] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.45" [Fri Aug 14 06:52:45 2015] source mask rpix=0.9, npix_max = 8, mask sum = 6, frac = 0.739 [Fri Aug 14 06:52:45 2015] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 1, mean size = 0.45" [Fri Aug 14 07:00:00 2015] fullrun_ccd1_acisf13525_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src9.ximg exists [Fri Aug 14 07:00:00 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd1_acisf13525_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src9.csv [Fri Aug 14 07:00:00 2015] fullrun_ccd1_acisf13525_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg exists [Fri Aug 14 07:00:00 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd1_acisf13525_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src9.csv [Fri Aug 14 07:00:00 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_ccd1_acisf13525_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd1_acisf13525_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Fri Aug 14 07:00:00 2015] fullrun_ccd1_acisf13525_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists [Fri Aug 14 07:00:00 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd1_acisf13525_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.csv [Fri Aug 14 07:00:00 2015] fullrun_ccd1_acisf13525_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists [Fri Aug 14 07:00:00 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd1_acisf13525_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.csv [Fri Aug 14 07:00:00 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_ccd1_acisf13525_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd1_acisf13525_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Fri Aug 14 07:12:20 2015] Spatial fit model total counts = 15.405600, observed total counts = 18.000000 [Fri Aug 14 07:12:20 2015] Offset between fit and detection position for source 8 = 0.006890 pixels Spatial fit parameters: Offset between fit and detection position for source 8 = 0.006890 pixels Position = (1241.1, 727.9) = 6 25 34.33 -53 52 55.1 Extent = 0.6 (0.4-0.9)" x 0.3 (0.2-0.5)", rotation angle = 360 (336-31) degrees Source counts = 15.9 +/- 4.0 Background counts = 0.0 Rate = 0.0003 +/- 8e-05 [Fri Aug 14 07:12:20 2015] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Fri Aug 14 07:12:20 2015] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Fri Aug 14 07:12:20 2015] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound [Fri Aug 14 07:12:20 2015] Source does appear to be extended [Fri Aug 14 07:12:20 2015] Computing asymmetry using errors on major and minor axis (from spatial fitting), asym = 0.92