[Fri Aug 14 06:18:53 2015] Detection parameters:
  Position = (1301.7, 690.2) = 6 25 30.93 -53 53 13.4
  Extent = 0.5" x 0.5", rotation angle = 12 degrees
  Source counts = 15.2 +/- 4.0
  Background counts = 0.8
  Rate = 0.0003 +/- 8e-05

[Fri Aug 14 06:18:54 2015] Off-axis axis estimate = 1.74'
[Fri Aug 14 06:27:15 2015] Using EEF radius (= 0.41 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Aug 14 06:27:15 2015] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.41"
[Fri Aug 14 06:27:15 2015] source mask rpix=0.8, npix_max = 7, mask sum = 9, frac = 1.277
[Fri Aug 14 06:27:15 2015] Giving source the simple spatial ID 11 for pass 0, mean size = 0.41"
[Fri Aug 14 06:35:39 2015] fullrun_ccd1_acisf13525_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src11.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 14 06:35:39 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd1_acisf13525_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src11.csv
[Fri Aug 14 06:35:39 2015] fullrun_ccd1_acisf13525_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src11_1.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 14 06:35:39 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd1_acisf13525_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src11.csv
[Fri Aug 14 06:35:39 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd1_acisf13525_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src11_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd1_acisf13525_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src11.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Aug 14 06:35:39 2015] fullrun_ccd1_acisf13525_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src11.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 14 06:35:39 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd1_acisf13525_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src11.csv
[Fri Aug 14 06:35:39 2015] fullrun_ccd1_acisf13525_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src11_1.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 14 06:35:39 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd1_acisf13525_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src11.csv
[Fri Aug 14 06:35:39 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd1_acisf13525_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src11_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd1_acisf13525_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src11.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Aug 14 06:49:27 2015] Spatial fit model total counts = 14.771900, observed total counts = 16.000000
[Fri Aug 14 06:49:27 2015] Offset between fit and detection position for source 10 = 0.350636 pixels
[Fri Aug 14 06:49:27 2015] 15.576340 total counts/ 3.915340 bgd. counts: snr = 5.893198
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 10 = 0.350636 pixels
  Position = (1301.5, 690.5) = 6 25 30.97 -53 53 13.5
  Extent = 0.1 (0.1-0.2)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 11.7 +/- 3.9
  Background counts = 3.9
  Rate = 0.0002 +/- 8e-05
[Fri Aug 14 06:49:27 2015] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Aug 14 06:49:27 2015] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Aug 14 06:49:27 2015] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Fri Aug 14 06:49:27 2015] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Aug 14 06:49:27 2015] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Aug 14 06:52:45 2015] Using previous fit value to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Aug 14 06:52:45 2015] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.14"
[Fri Aug 14 06:52:45 2015] source mask rpix=0.3, npix_max = 2, mask sum = 1, frac = 0.402
[Fri Aug 14 06:52:45 2015] Skipping simple spatial due to low active detector fraction
[Fri Aug 14 07:12:20 2015] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Aug 14 07:12:20 2015] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Aug 14 07:12:20 2015] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Fri Aug 14 07:12:20 2015] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Aug 14 07:12:20 2015] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00