[Fri Aug 14 00:06:26 2015] Detection parameters:
  Position = (740.4, 626.6) = 8 24 8.89 -42 58 9.4
  Extent = 0.5" x 0.5", rotation angle = 44 degrees
  Source counts = 36.3 +/- 16.0
  Background counts = 218.7
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.001

[Fri Aug 14 00:06:42 2015] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.79'
[Fri Aug 14 00:12:04 2015] Using EEF radius (= 0.54 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Aug 14 00:12:04 2015] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.54"
[Fri Aug 14 00:12:04 2015] source mask rpix=1.1, npix_max = 10, mask sum = 9, frac = 0.881
[Fri Aug 14 00:12:04 2015] Giving source the simple spatial ID 98 for pass 0, mean size = 0.54"
[Fri Aug 14 00:12:06 2015] fullrun_ccd7_acisf13293_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src98.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 14 00:12:06 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf13293_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src98.csv
[Fri Aug 14 00:12:06 2015] fullrun_ccd7_acisf13293_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src98_1.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 14 00:12:06 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf13293_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src98.csv
[Fri Aug 14 00:12:06 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd7_acisf13293_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src98_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd7_acisf13293_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src98.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Aug 14 00:12:06 2015] fullrun_ccd7_acisf13293_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src98.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 14 00:12:06 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf13293_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src98.csv
[Fri Aug 14 00:12:06 2015] fullrun_ccd7_acisf13293_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src98_1.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 14 00:12:06 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf13293_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src98.csv
[Fri Aug 14 00:12:06 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd7_acisf13293_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src98_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd7_acisf13293_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src98.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Aug 14 00:12:25 2015] Spatial fit model total counts = 2297.110000, observed total counts = 2556.000000
[Fri Aug 14 00:12:25 2015] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 105
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Fri Aug 14 00:12:25 2015] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Aug 14 00:12:25 2015] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Aug 14 00:12:25 2015] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Aug 14 00:12:25 2015] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Aug 14 00:12:25 2015] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Aug 14 00:12:25 2015] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9