[Thu Aug 13 23:57:38 2015] Detection parameters: Position = (729.3, 663.0) = 2 48 18.43 60 15 49.1 Extent = 0.9" x 0.5", rotation angle = 67 degrees Source counts = 10.8 +/- 3.3 Background counts = 0.2 Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0004 [Thu Aug 13 23:57:38 2015] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.87' [Thu Aug 13 23:58:09 2015] Using EEF radius (= 1.57 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Thu Aug 13 23:58:09 2015] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass [Thu Aug 13 23:58:09 2015] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 1.57" [Thu Aug 13 23:58:09 2015] source mask rpix=3.2, npix_max = 54, mask sum = 56, frac = 1.032 [Thu Aug 13 23:58:09 2015] Giving source the simple spatial ID 2 for pass 0, mean size = 1.57" [Thu Aug 13 23:58:10 2015] fullrun_ccd3_acisf13289_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src2.ximg exists [Thu Aug 13 23:58:10 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf13289_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src2.csv [Thu Aug 13 23:58:10 2015] fullrun_ccd3_acisf13289_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src2_1.ximg exists [Thu Aug 13 23:58:10 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf13289_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src2.csv [Thu Aug 13 23:58:10 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_ccd3_acisf13289_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src2_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd3_acisf13289_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src2.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Thu Aug 13 23:58:10 2015] fullrun_ccd3_acisf13289_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2.ximg exists [Thu Aug 13 23:58:10 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf13289_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2.csv [Thu Aug 13 23:58:10 2015] fullrun_ccd3_acisf13289_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2_1.ximg exists [Thu Aug 13 23:58:10 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf13289_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2.csv [Thu Aug 13 23:58:10 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_ccd3_acisf13289_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd3_acisf13289_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Thu Aug 13 23:58:13 2015] Warning: source 2 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 2 at 17.773601 pixels away [Thu Aug 13 23:58:13 2015] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Thu Aug 13 23:58:13 2015] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Thu Aug 13 23:58:13 2015] Assessing source extent using major [Thu Aug 13 23:58:13 2015] Source does appear to be extended [Thu Aug 13 23:58:13 2015] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.81 [Thu Aug 13 23:58:13 2015] Source is asymmetric [Thu Aug 13 23:58:27 2015] Using EEF radius (= 1.57 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Thu Aug 13 23:58:27 2015] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass [Thu Aug 13 23:58:27 2015] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 1.57" [Thu Aug 13 23:58:27 2015] source mask rpix=3.2, npix_max = 54, mask sum = 56, frac = 1.032 [Thu Aug 13 23:58:27 2015] Giving source the simple spatial ID 2 for pass 1, mean size = 1.57" [Thu Aug 13 23:58:27 2015] fullrun_ccd3_acisf13289_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src2.ximg exists [Thu Aug 13 23:58:27 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf13289_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src2.csv [Thu Aug 13 23:58:27 2015] fullrun_ccd3_acisf13289_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src2_1.ximg exists [Thu Aug 13 23:58:27 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf13289_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src2.csv [Thu Aug 13 23:58:27 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_ccd3_acisf13289_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src2_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd3_acisf13289_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src2.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Thu Aug 13 23:58:27 2015] fullrun_ccd3_acisf13289_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2.ximg exists [Thu Aug 13 23:58:27 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf13289_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2.csv [Thu Aug 13 23:58:27 2015] fullrun_ccd3_acisf13289_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2_1.ximg exists [Thu Aug 13 23:58:27 2015] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf13289_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2.csv [Thu Aug 13 23:58:27 2015] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_ccd3_acisf13289_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd3_acisf13289_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Thu Aug 13 23:58:30 2015] Warning: source 2 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 2 at 17.773601 pixels away [Thu Aug 13 23:58:30 2015] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Thu Aug 13 23:58:30 2015] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Thu Aug 13 23:58:30 2015] Assessing source extent using major [Thu Aug 13 23:58:30 2015] Source does appear to be extended [Thu Aug 13 23:58:30 2015] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.81 [Thu Aug 13 23:58:30 2015] Source is asymmetric