[Fri Oct 21 21:47:54 2011] Detection parameters:
  Position = (217.5, 237.5) = 5 34 29.08 22 1 31.7
  Extent = 0.5" x 0.5", rotation angle = 65 degrees
  Source counts = 412.7 +/- 40.6
  Background counts = 1234.3
  Rate = 0.7 +/- 0.07

[Fri Oct 21 21:47:55 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 0.88'
[Fri Oct 21 21:58:51 2011] Using EEF radius (= 0.38 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Oct 21 21:58:51 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.38"
[Fri Oct 21 21:58:51 2011] source mask rpix=0.8, npix_max = 6, mask sum = 9, frac = 1.387
[Fri Oct 21 21:58:51 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 93 for pass 0, mean size = 0.38"
[Fri Oct 21 23:39:31 2011] fullrun_ccd7_acisf13209_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src93.ximg exists
[Fri Oct 21 23:39:31 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf13209_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src93.csv
[Fri Oct 21 23:39:31 2011] fullrun_ccd7_acisf13209_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src93_1.ximg exists
[Fri Oct 21 23:39:31 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf13209_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src93.csv
[Fri Oct 21 23:39:31 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd7_acisf13209_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src93_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd7_acisf13209_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src93.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Oct 21 23:39:32 2011] fullrun_ccd7_acisf13209_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src93.ximg exists
[Fri Oct 21 23:39:32 2011] fullrun_ccd7_acisf13209_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src93_1.ximg exists
[Fri Oct 21 23:39:32 2011] Fit fullrun_ccd7_acisf13209_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src93 appears to have run properly
[Fri Oct 21 23:39:51 2011] Source 93 is offset by -0.891410 and -1.524936 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.962098 x 0.962098, not incorporating fit results
[Fri Oct 21 23:39:51 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Oct 21 23:39:51 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Oct 21 23:39:51 2011] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Oct 21 23:39:51 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Oct 21 23:39:51 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Oct 21 23:40:08 2011] Using EEF radius (= 0.38 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Oct 21 23:40:08 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.38"
[Fri Oct 21 23:40:08 2011] source mask rpix=0.8, npix_max = 6, mask sum = 9, frac = 1.387
[Fri Oct 21 23:40:08 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 83 for pass 1, mean size = 0.38"
[Sat Oct 22 02:31:32 2011] fullrun_ccd7_acisf13209_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src83.ximg exists
[Sat Oct 22 02:31:32 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf13209_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src83.csv
[Sat Oct 22 02:31:32 2011] fullrun_ccd7_acisf13209_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src83_1.ximg exists
[Sat Oct 22 02:31:32 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf13209_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src83.csv
[Sat Oct 22 02:31:32 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd7_acisf13209_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src83_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd7_acisf13209_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src83.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Oct 22 02:31:33 2011] fullrun_ccd7_acisf13209_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src83.ximg exists
[Sat Oct 22 02:31:33 2011] fullrun_ccd7_acisf13209_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src83_1.ximg exists
[Sat Oct 22 02:31:33 2011] Fit fullrun_ccd7_acisf13209_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src83 appears to have run properly
[Sat Oct 22 02:31:50 2011] Spatial fit model total counts = 9223.060000, observed total counts = 9208.000000
[Sat Oct 22 02:31:50 2011] Offset between fit and detection position for source 93 = 1.324888 pixels
[Sat Oct 22 02:31:50 2011] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 83 to 32
[Sat Oct 22 02:31:50 2011] 9144.024000 total counts/ 9125.610000 bgd. counts: snr = 0.192760
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 93 = 1.324888 pixels
  Position = (218.4, 238.5) = 5 34 29.06 22 1 31.9
  Extent = 0.3" x 0.3", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 18.4 +/- 95.6
  Background counts = 9125.6
  Rate = 0.03 +/- 0.2
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability