[Sun Feb 12 23:12:54 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (1336.6, 772.6) = 12 14 4.84 -65 33 18.5
  Extent = 1.7" x 0.9", rotation angle = 52 degrees
  Source counts = 12.1 +/- 4.1
  Background counts = 4.9
  Rate = 0.0001 +/- 4e-05

[Sun Feb 12 23:12:54 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 6.63'
[Mon Feb 13 01:30:14 2012] Using EEF radius (= 1.96 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Feb 13 01:30:14 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 1.96"
[Mon Feb 13 01:30:14 2012] source mask rpix=4.0, npix_max = 80, mask sum = 81, frac = 1.004
[Mon Feb 13 01:30:14 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 61 for pass 0, mean size = 1.96"
[Mon Feb 13 02:47:07 2012] fullrun_ccd3_acisf13158_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src61.ximg exists
[Mon Feb 13 02:47:07 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf13158_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src61.csv
[Mon Feb 13 02:47:07 2012] fullrun_ccd3_acisf13158_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src61_1.ximg exists
[Mon Feb 13 02:47:07 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf13158_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src61.csv
[Mon Feb 13 02:47:07 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd3_acisf13158_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src61_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd3_acisf13158_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src61.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Feb 13 02:47:08 2012] fullrun_ccd3_acisf13158_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src61.ximg exists
[Mon Feb 13 02:47:08 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf13158_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src61.csv
[Mon Feb 13 02:47:08 2012] fullrun_ccd3_acisf13158_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src61_1.ximg exists
[Mon Feb 13 02:47:08 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf13158_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src61.csv
[Mon Feb 13 02:47:08 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd3_acisf13158_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src61_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd3_acisf13158_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src61.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Feb 13 02:47:35 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 18.739100, observed total counts = 22.000000
[Mon Feb 13 02:47:35 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 44 = 2.690795 pixels
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 44 = 2.690795 pixels
  Position = (1338.5, 774.5) = 12 14 4.73 -65 33 17.9
  Extent = 1.5 (0.9-2.2)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 17.3 +/- 4.2
  Background counts = 0.0
  Rate = 0.0002 +/- 4e-05
[Mon Feb 13 02:47:35 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Feb 13 02:47:35 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Feb 13 02:47:35 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Mon Feb 13 02:47:35 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Feb 13 02:47:35 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Feb 13 04:41:05 2012] Using previous fit value to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Feb 13 04:41:05 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 1.55"
[Mon Feb 13 04:41:05 2012] source mask rpix=3.1, npix_max = 53, mask sum = 49, frac = 0.922
[Mon Feb 13 04:41:05 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 56 for pass 1, mean size = 1.55"
[Mon Feb 13 05:49:04 2012] fullrun_ccd3_acisf13158_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src56.ximg exists
[Mon Feb 13 05:49:04 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf13158_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src56.csv
[Mon Feb 13 05:49:04 2012] fullrun_ccd3_acisf13158_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src56_1.ximg exists
[Mon Feb 13 05:49:04 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf13158_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src56.csv
[Mon Feb 13 05:49:04 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd3_acisf13158_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src56_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd3_acisf13158_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src56.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Feb 13 05:49:05 2012] fullrun_ccd3_acisf13158_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src56.ximg exists
[Mon Feb 13 05:49:05 2012] fullrun_ccd3_acisf13158_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src56_1.ximg exists
[Mon Feb 13 05:49:05 2012] Fit fullrun_ccd3_acisf13158_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src56 appears to have run properly
[Mon Feb 13 05:49:29 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 23.094000, observed total counts = 23.000000
[Mon Feb 13 05:49:29 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 44 = 1.193285 pixels
[Mon Feb 13 05:49:29 2012] 22.621570 total counts/ 15.308500 bgd. counts: snr = 1.869104
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 44 = 1.193285 pixels
  Position = (1339.6, 774.9) = 12 14 4.64 -65 33 17.7
  Extent = 0.7 (0.4-1.0)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 7.3 +/- 4.8
  Background counts = 15.3
  Rate = 8e-05 +/- 5e-05
[Mon Feb 13 05:49:29 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Feb 13 05:49:29 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Feb 13 05:49:29 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Mon Feb 13 05:49:29 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Feb 13 05:49:29 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Feb 13 05:49:29 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.7