[Sun Feb 12 23:10:51 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (288.0, 521.6) = 12 15 21.55 -65 23 17.9 Extent = 1.3" x 1.2", rotation angle = 101 degrees Source counts = 16.1 +/- 6.5 Background counts = 25.9 Rate = 0.0002 +/- 7e-05 [Sun Feb 12 23:10:51 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 6.17' [Sun Feb 12 23:21:50 2012] Using EEF radius (= 1.71 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sun Feb 12 23:21:50 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 1.71" [Sun Feb 12 23:21:50 2012] source mask rpix=3.5, npix_max = 63, mask sum = 64, frac = 1.008 [Sun Feb 12 23:21:50 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 33 for pass 0, mean size = 1.71" [Mon Feb 13 00:11:24 2012] fullrun_ccd0_acisf13158_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src33.ximg exists [Mon Feb 13 00:11:24 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd0_acisf13158_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src33.csv [Mon Feb 13 00:11:24 2012] fullrun_ccd0_acisf13158_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src33_1.ximg exists [Mon Feb 13 00:11:24 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd0_acisf13158_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src33.csv [Mon Feb 13 00:11:24 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_ccd0_acisf13158_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src33_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd0_acisf13158_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src33.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon Feb 13 00:11:25 2012] fullrun_ccd0_acisf13158_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src33.ximg exists [Mon Feb 13 00:11:25 2012] fullrun_ccd0_acisf13158_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src33_1.ximg exists [Mon Feb 13 00:11:25 2012] Fit fullrun_ccd0_acisf13158_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src33 appears to have run properly [Mon Feb 13 02:47:18 2012] Source 33 is offset by 0.581553 and -3.372248 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 1.745045 x 1.745045, not incorporating fit results [Mon Feb 13 02:47:18 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Mon Feb 13 02:47:18 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Mon Feb 13 02:47:18 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Mon Feb 13 02:47:18 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Mon Feb 13 02:47:18 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.12 [Mon Feb 13 02:48:00 2012] Using EEF radius (= 1.71 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Mon Feb 13 02:48:00 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 1.71" [Mon Feb 13 02:48:00 2012] source mask rpix=3.5, npix_max = 63, mask sum = 64, frac = 1.008 [Mon Feb 13 02:48:00 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 29 for pass 1, mean size = 1.71" [Mon Feb 13 03:31:21 2012] fullrun_ccd0_acisf13158_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src29.ximg exists [Mon Feb 13 03:31:21 2012] fullrun_ccd0_acisf13158_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src29_1.ximg exists [Mon Feb 13 03:31:21 2012] Fit fullrun_ccd0_acisf13158_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src29 appears to have run properly [Mon Feb 13 03:31:21 2012] fullrun_ccd0_acisf13158_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src29.ximg exists [Mon Feb 13 03:31:21 2012] fullrun_ccd0_acisf13158_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src29_1.ximg exists [Mon Feb 13 03:31:21 2012] Fit fullrun_ccd0_acisf13158_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src29 appears to have run properly [Mon Feb 13 05:49:13 2012] Warning: source 29 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 33 at 20.069517 pixels away [Mon Feb 13 05:49:13 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Mon Feb 13 05:49:13 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Mon Feb 13 05:49:13 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Mon Feb 13 05:49:13 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Mon Feb 13 05:49:13 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.12 [Mon Feb 13 05:49:13 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9