[Sat Sep 24 01:50:03 2011] Detection parameters:
  Position = (347.2, 523.1) = 15 56 7.97 66 19 6.2
  Extent = 0.6" x 0.5", rotation angle = 154 degrees
  Source counts = 13.7 +/- 3.9
  Background counts = 1.3
  Rate = 0.0003 +/- 9e-05

[Sat Sep 24 01:50:03 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 4.59'
[Sat Sep 24 01:52:39 2011] Using EEF radius (= 1.02 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Sep 24 01:52:39 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 1.02"
[Sat Sep 24 01:52:39 2011] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 26, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.938
[Sat Sep 24 01:52:39 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 18 for pass 0, mean size = 1.02"
[Sat Sep 24 02:11:02 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf13020_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src18.ximg exists
[Sat Sep 24 02:11:02 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd0_acisf13020_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src18.csv
[Sat Sep 24 02:11:02 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf13020_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src18_1.ximg exists
[Sat Sep 24 02:11:02 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd0_acisf13020_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src18.csv
[Sat Sep 24 02:11:02 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd0_acisf13020_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src18_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd0_acisf13020_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src18.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Sep 24 02:11:02 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf13020_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18.ximg exists
[Sat Sep 24 02:11:02 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd0_acisf13020_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18.csv
[Sat Sep 24 02:11:02 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf13020_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18_1.ximg exists
[Sat Sep 24 02:11:02 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd0_acisf13020_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18.csv
[Sat Sep 24 02:11:02 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd0_acisf13020_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd0_acisf13020_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Sep 24 03:19:47 2011] Spatial fit model total counts = 14.879200, observed total counts = 17.000000
[Sat Sep 24 03:19:47 2011] Offset between fit and detection position for source 22 = 0.974934 pixels
[Sat Sep 24 03:19:47 2011] 15.430510 total counts/ 2.179810 bgd. counts: snr = 8.974898
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 22 = 0.974934 pixels
  Position = (348.1, 523.3) = 15 56 7.94 66 19 6.1
  Extent = 0.6 (0.4-0.7)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 13.3 +/- 3.9
  Background counts = 2.2
  Rate = 0.0003 +/- 9e-05
[Sat Sep 24 03:19:47 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Sep 24 03:19:47 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Sep 24 03:19:47 2011] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Sat Sep 24 03:19:47 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Sep 24 03:19:47 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Sep 24 03:19:47 2011] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9